Browse the latest research summaries in the field of musculoskeletal medicine for spinal cord injury patients and caregivers.
Showing 231-240 of 278 results
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil., 2007 • January 1, 2007
This systematic review assessed literature to provide clinical guidance for optimizing bone health after SCI, focusing on preventing acute bone loss and treating established low bone mass in long-stan...
KEY FINDING: Moderate evidence supports the use of pharmacology, particularly bisphosphonates, for treating bone loss after SCI.
Osteoporos Int, 2013 • March 1, 2013
This study assessed circulating proteins as biomarkers of bone status in men with chronic SCI, finding sclerostin significantly associated with bone mineral content and density at all sites tested. Th...
KEY FINDING: Lower sclerostin levels were significantly associated with lower bone mineral content and bone density at all skeletal sites tested.
Journal of Osteoporosis, 2012 • July 9, 2012
This study evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients compared to controls, focusing on the distal femur as a potentially more sensitive site for assessing bone loss. Th...
KEY FINDING: BMD was significantly lower in SCI patients than in controls at all femoral sites (femoral neck, total femur, and distal femur).
Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2012 • December 1, 2012
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to rapid and severe osteoporosis with increased fracture risk due to mechanical unloading and increased sclerostin expression. Sclerostin plays a dual role, acting as a ...
KEY FINDING: Sclerostin is a key mediator in SCI-induced bone loss. Initially, sclerostin levels increase after SCI due to mechanical unloading, leading to reduced bone formation.
Yonsei Med J, 2013 • May 1, 2013
This study aimed to determine the correlation between spinal fracture patterns (Denis classification) and neurologic recovery in surgically managed patients with thoracolumbar fractures and neurologic...
KEY FINDING: The common injuries making neurologic deterioration were burst fracture and fracture-dislocation.
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2013 • January 1, 2013
This study examined the impact of active-resisted versus passive stance on regional bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) using a novel quadrant analysis of pQCT scan...
KEY FINDING: Over 1.5 years, the rate of bone mineral density (BMD) decline was slower in all quadrants of the femur for limbs undergoing active-resisted stance compared to passive stance.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013 • July 27, 2013
This study investigated the effects of different stretching protocols on knee contractures in rats with spinal cord injuries. The protocols varied in torque (high or low) and duration (long or short) ...
KEY FINDING: High-torque and long-duration static stretching led to greater restoration of ROM than the other torque and duration treatment groups.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2013 • July 1, 2013
This report presents a case of intersection syndrome in a handcyclist with a spinal cord injury, highlighting the importance of considering this diagnosis in active individuals with SCI. The case emph...
KEY FINDING: A handcyclist with a spinal cord injury developed intersection syndrome after a long training session involving repetitive wrist flexion and extension.
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2013 • January 1, 2013
This study investigated the effects of nandrolone, an anabolic steroid, on bone loss in rats after spinal cord injury (SCI). The results showed that nandrolone attenuated bone loss after SCI, suggesti...
KEY FINDING: SCI reduced distal femoral and proximal tibial bone mineral density (BMD) by 25 and 16%, respectively, at 56 days.
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2014 • May 1, 2014
This study examined the effects of 14 weeks of electromyostimulation (EMS) training on muscle and bone loss prevention in men with recent, complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The intervention group sho...
KEY FINDING: EMS training significantly increased quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle size compared to the control group.