Worldwide productivity and research trend of publications concerning electroactive materials and spinal cord injury: A bibliometric study

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2023 · DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1094059 · Published: February 27, 2023

Spinal Cord Injury Biomedical Research Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study uses bibliometric analysis to examine research trends in electroactive materials for spinal cord injury (SCI) over the past decade. The study identifies key countries, institutions, authors, and journals involved in this research area. It also explores the shift in research focus from traditional treatments to newer materials and techniques.

Study Duration

10 Years

Participants

1,330 relevant papers or reviews

Evidence Level

Not specified

Key Findings

1
The number of publications and average annual citation rate in the field are increasing.
2
The United States and China are the leading countries in this research area, with the United States having a higher citation count.
3
Current research hotspots include carbon-based materials, functional recovery, and surgery.

Research Summary

This study analyzes publications on electroactive materials for spinal cord injury from 2012 to 2022, finding a growing interest in the field. The research identifies the United States and China as major contributors, with a shift in research focus towards carbon-based materials and functional recovery. The study concludes that the role of injectable conductive hydrogels in spinal cord healing is a significant area of interest, particularly concerning oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Practical Implications

Research Direction

Highlights current trends like carbon-based materials and functional recovery, guiding future research efforts.

Collaboration Opportunities

Identifies key institutions and authors, facilitating potential collaborations.

Journal Selection

Provides insights for researchers to choose appropriate journals for publication.

Study Limitations

1
The analysis is limited to the WOS core database.
2
Qualitative analysis is subjective.
3
The study only reflects current trends and may not capture the entire scope of research.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury