Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Proposed International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Preliminary Validation Data

Proposed International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Preliminary Validation Data

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2012 · DOI: 10.1310/sci1802-143 · Published: January 1, 2012

Spinal Cord InjuryPain ManagementResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

An international group created a standard way to classify pain after spinal cord injury called the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) classification. This study checked how well different doctors and therapists agreed when using the ISCIP classification after only a small amount of training. The study found that people were generally confident in using the ISCIP system, but some types of pain were harder to classify than others.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
56 physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and nurses
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Respondents showed high confidence in identifying the number of pain components, with an average correctness of 86%.
  • 2
    Classifying certain pain subtypes, such as autonomic dysreflexia headache and abdominal pain after SCI, proved challenging.
  • 3
    Misclassification occurred in at-level SCI pain in the setting of cauda equina injury as below-level SCI pain.

Research Summary

This study assessed the reliability of the ISCIP classification among clinicians with minimal training, using clinical vignettes. The results showed moderate reliability, with some pain subtypes being more difficult to classify than others. The authors suggest further testing with real patients and clarification of the classification's instructional manual.

Practical Implications

Training Improvement

More detailed training on the ISCIP classification is needed, especially for atypical pain presentations.

Classification Refinement

The ISCIP classification manual should be updated to provide clearer guidance on classifying complex and less common pain subtypes.

Real-World Validation

The ISCIP classification needs to be tested with real patients to ensure its applicability and reliability in clinical practice.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Use of clinical vignettes instead of real patients.
  • 2
    Minimal training provided to participants on the ISCIP classification.
  • 3
    Challenges in classifying specific pain subtypes.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury