Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Traversing the Translational Trail for Trials

Traversing the Translational Trail for Trials

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2012 · DOI: 10.1310/sci1801-79 · Published: January 1, 2012

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitationResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

Clinical trials for neurological disorders do not readily lend themselves to using a simple and direct outcome measure (clinical endpoint) to detect whether a drug, cell transplant, or rehabilitation strategy provides a meaningful (functional) benefit to patients. The central nervous system (CNS) is the most heterogeneous tissue of the body with hundreds of different cell phenotypes, each of which is capable of responding to a particular treatment in some specific and perhaps unpredictable or incomplete manner. In this review, the focus is on rehabilitation strategies, and spinal cord injury (SCI) will be used as a model CNS disorder.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    RCTs usually provide the strongest evidence for a treatment effect that most everyone will accept with a high degree of confidence.
  • 2
    The largest degree of recovery occurs within the first few weeks and months after the initial damage.
  • 3
    Increasing the likelihood that patients with sensorimotor complete SCI can regain function over as little as 2 spinal cord segments can make a dramatic improvement in their ability to independently complete many self-care activities

Research Summary

The principles of spinal cord injury clinical trial programs are briefly reviewed as one example of the challenge faced by most human studies of neurologically directed therapeutic interventions, including rehabilitation strategies. Different trial protocols are reviewed, as are inclusion/exclusion criteria for study subjects, the choice of clinical endpoints, and the statistical approaches that might be used in a trial program. Potential factors that might confound the accurate interpretation of trial data are also identified.

Practical Implications

Improved Trial Design

Careful consideration of study design, subject selection, and outcome measures can improve the validity of clinical trials for neurological disorders.

Realistic Expectations

Setting realistic expectations for therapeutic effects, such as focusing on meaningful functional improvements rather than complete regeneration, can lead to more successful trials.

Personalized Rehabilitation

Understanding the heterogeneity of CNS disorders and tailoring rehabilitation interventions to specific subtypes or stages can optimize patient outcomes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Heterogeneity of study subjects
  • 2
    Difficulty in establishing clear clinical endpoints
  • 3
    Influence of spontaneous recovery on treatment outcomes

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury