Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2012 · DOI: 10.1310/sci1801-79 · Published: January 1, 2012
Clinical trials for neurological disorders do not readily lend themselves to using a simple and direct outcome measure (clinical endpoint) to detect whether a drug, cell transplant, or rehabilitation strategy provides a meaningful (functional) benefit to patients. The central nervous system (CNS) is the most heterogeneous tissue of the body with hundreds of different cell phenotypes, each of which is capable of responding to a particular treatment in some specific and perhaps unpredictable or incomplete manner. In this review, the focus is on rehabilitation strategies, and spinal cord injury (SCI) will be used as a model CNS disorder.
Careful consideration of study design, subject selection, and outcome measures can improve the validity of clinical trials for neurological disorders.
Setting realistic expectations for therapeutic effects, such as focusing on meaningful functional improvements rather than complete regeneration, can lead to more successful trials.
Understanding the heterogeneity of CNS disorders and tailoring rehabilitation interventions to specific subtypes or stages can optimize patient outcomes.