Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Time-to-enrollment in clinical trials investigating neurological recovery in chronic spinal cord injury: observations from a systematic review and ClinicalTrials.gov database

Time-to-enrollment in clinical trials investigating neurological recovery in chronic spinal cord injury: observations from a systematic review and ClinicalTrials.gov database

Neural Regeneration Research, 2022 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.324826 · Published: September 17, 2021

Spinal Cord InjuryRegenerative MedicineResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study investigates the impact of the time between spinal cord injury (SCI) and enrollment in clinical trials on the outcomes of regenerative therapies for chronic SCI. The researchers analyzed data from ClinicalTrials.gov and individual patient data from nine clinical trials to evaluate how the time-to-enrollment affects motor and sensory improvements. The study found that enrolling patients with a wide range of injury durations may lead to imprecise outcomes, suggesting that clinical trial designs should consider appropriate post-injury time frames to assess therapeutic benefit.

Study Duration
1990 to 2018
Participants
156 chronic SCI patients
Evidence Level
Systematic Review and Database Analysis

Key Findings

  • 1
    The majority of chronic SCI trials in ClinicalTrials.gov do not restrict the maximum post-injury time for trial eligibility.
  • 2
    There are varying degrees of motor and sensory improvement among different time-to-enrollment groups in regenerative therapy trials.
  • 3
    The average improvement in motor scores for baseline AIS A was 6.59 ± 5.14 in the Group 1, 6.85 ± 5.98 in the Group 2 and 2.46 ± 4.14 in the Group 3.

Research Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of time-to-enrollment in chronic SCI clinical trials by analyzing data from ClinicalTrials.gov and individual patient data from regenerative intervention trials. The results indicated that most chronic SCI trials have unrestricted maximum post-injury time for eligibility, and varying degrees of motor and sensory improvement are observed across different time-to-enrollment groups. The authors conclude that clinical trial designs should consider appropriate post-injury time frames to evaluate therapeutic benefit, as enrolling patients with wide ranges of time-to-enrollment may present imprecise outcomes.

Practical Implications

Optimizing Clinical Trial Design

Future clinical trials for chronic SCI should consider restricting the range of post-injury time for enrollment to obtain more precise and generalizable outcomes.

Personalized Therapy

The timing of regenerative interventions may need to be tailored to individual patients based on their specific injury profiles and time since injury.

Understanding Spontaneous Recovery

Well-powered studies with robust control arms are needed to differentiate the impact of treatment from spontaneous recovery, especially in the chronic stages of SCI.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    [object Object]
  • 2
    [object Object]
  • 3
    [object Object]

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury