Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. The evidence supporting single-use intermittent catheters in people with spinal cord injury

The evidence supporting single-use intermittent catheters in people with spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 2020 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-00339-5 · Published: September 15, 2020

Spinal Cord InjuryUrologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

Intermittent catheterization (IMC) is the accepted evidence-based best practice for bladder management in people with voiding dysfunction due to neurogenic bladder. The two methods for performing IMC over the decades since this practice was introduced are reuse and single-use catheters. There are perceived advantages and disadvantages of each method of performing IMC. There is considerable evidence that single-use IMC is associated with better health outcomes, including reduced risk of urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, and quality of life.

Study Duration
4 weeks
Participants
39 participants who practiced catheter reuse
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    There was a significant increase in the reported quality of life after switching from reuse to single-use hydrophilic catheters.
  • 2
    At the conclusion of the study, 83% of participants preferred to continue using the single-use catheters.
  • 3
    All collected reused catheters (100%) were contaminated by debris and 74% had contamination by microorganisms.

Research Summary

Intermittent catheterization (IMC) is the accepted evidence-based best practice for bladder management in people with voiding dysfunction due to neurogenic bladder. There is considerable evidence that single-use IMC is associated with better health outcomes, including reduced risk of urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, and quality of life. Current international guidelines continue to highlight the lack of evidence on appropriate storage and cleaning procedures for reuse IMC.

Practical Implications

Preference for Single-Use Catheters

People performing IMC indicate a preference for single-use catheters due to improved quality of life and reduced contamination.

Guideline Recommendations

Single-use hydrophilic catheters are recommended as the preferred method of bladder management due to reduced risk of urethral trauma and urinary tract infection.

Cost Considerations

In countries where the health or disability systems cover the cost of single-use catheters or people can afford the cost, single-use catheters should be the preferred routine method of choice.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Lack of adequately powered multicenter RCT comparing reuse with single-use IMC.
  • 2
    Challenges associated with progressing research on washing and storage of reuse catheters.
  • 3
    Recruitment challenges for reuse IMC trials due to community nurses recommending single-use catheters.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury