Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Healthcare
  4. Testing the measurement invariance of the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale short form across four diagnostic subgroups

Testing the measurement invariance of the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale short form across four diagnostic subgroups

Qual Life Res, 2016 · DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1300-z · Published: October 1, 2016

HealthcareMental HealthResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study evaluates whether a self-efficacy scale, the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale (UW-SES), measures the same concept across different disability groups: muscular dystrophy (MD), multiple sclerosis (MS), post-polio syndrome (PPS), and spinal cord injury (SCI). Measurement invariance means the scale items have the same meaning across groups, allowing for valid comparisons of self-efficacy scores. The study used a statistical technique called multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) to test for different levels of measurement invariance.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
MD (n = 172), MS (n = 868), PPS (n = 225), and SCI (n = 242)
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The study found that the UW-SES short form has scalar invariance across the four diagnostic subgroups (MD, MS, PPS, and SCI).
  • 2
    Scalar invariance suggests that the UW-SES measures self-efficacy in the same way across these four groups.
  • 3
    The findings support the use of the UW-SES short form to compare self-efficacy scores among individuals with MD, MS, PPS, and SCI.

Research Summary

The University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale (UW-SES) was originally developed for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). This study evaluates the measurement invariance of the 6-item short form of the UW-SES across four disability subgroups. The results of this study support that the most rigorous form of invariance (i.e., scalar) holds for the 6-item short form of the UW-SES across the four diagnostic subgroups.

Practical Implications

Scale Validation

The 6-item short form of the UW-SES is validated for use in people with MD, MS, PPS, and SCI.

Group Comparison

Researchers and clinicians can confidently compare self-efficacy scores across these four diagnostic groups using the UW-SES.

Future Research

Future studies can explore whether similar results are obtained using Item Response Theory (IRT) approaches.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The study did not include demographic variables in the MG-CFA model due to the demographic variables not being substantially associated with UW-SES
  • 2
    The RMSEA statistic did not indicate acceptable fit for the configural invariance models
  • 3
    Future studies should examine whether the results are supported using IRT approaches in comparing across the four different diagnostic groups

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Healthcare