Survey of spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder studies using the Web of Science

Neural Regen Res, 2012 · DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.23.010 · Published: August 1, 2012

Simple Explanation

The study analyzes research trends on neurogenic bladder caused by spinal cord injury using bibliometric methods. Data was collected from the Web of Science, focusing on publications related to spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder. The analysis includes publication output, distribution by journal, subject area, country, and institution, as well as citation analysis.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

646 research articles

Evidence Level

Not specified

Key Findings

1
The United States has consistently been a leading country in research on spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder.
2
Urology and nephrology are the subject areas with the most studies related to spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder.
3
Spinal Cord is a prominent journal for publishing research on spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder.

Research Summary

This study identifies global trends in research on spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder through a bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science. There were 646 research articles addressing spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder in the Web of Science. From our analysis of the literature and research trends, we conclude that spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder is a hot topic that will continue to generate considerable research interest in the future.

Practical Implications

Research Insights

Provides an overview of research trends in spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder, aiding researchers in identifying key areas and journals.

Geographical Focus

Highlights leading countries and institutions, allowing for potential collaboration and resource allocation.

Future Research

Suggests that spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic bladder will remain a significant research area, encouraging further studies.

Study Limitations

1
The study relies on data from the Web of Science, which may not include all relevant publications.
2
The analysis is limited to publications indexed in English.
3
Bibliometric methods may not fully capture the qualitative aspects of the research.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury