Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Single-Center Case Series

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Single-Center Case Series

Journal of Pain Research, 2024 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S462587 · Published: June 10, 2024

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyPain Management

Simple Explanation

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is very hard to treat, affecting over 50% of SCI patients, and often doesn't respond to typical treatments. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is being explored as a possible treatment when drugs and other supportive care don't work, but its success has been limited. This study looked at using new ways of stimulating the spinal cord in patients with severe CNP after SCI, based on the researchers' past experiences.

Study Duration
12-month follow-up period
Participants
Eight individuals (4 males and 4 females) with CNP
Evidence Level
Case Series

Key Findings

  • 1
    Only two out of eight patients experienced significant pain relief with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) over a one-year follow-up.
  • 2
    High-frequency and burst SCS did not improve pain in the remaining six patients.
  • 3
    The findings suggest that SCS, even with new stimulation methods, isn't very effective for neuropathic pain after SCI.

Research Summary

This case series evaluated the effectiveness of burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in eight patients with central neuropathic pain (CNP) following spinal cord injury (SCI). The study found that only two patients experienced significant pain relief, while the remaining six showed no improvement with the new stimulation paradigms. The authors conclude that SCS, including burst and high-frequency stimulation, is not significantly effective in treating neuropathic pain in patients after SCI, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Practical Implications

Ineffectiveness of SCS

The study reinforces that SCS is generally ineffective for treating chronic neuropathic pain after SCI, despite incorporating new stimulation paradigms.

Need for Alternative Therapies

The findings emphasize the urgent need to explore and develop alternative therapeutic strategies for managing CNP in patients with SCI.

Potential Benefit in Incomplete SCI

SCS may still offer some benefit to a specific subset of patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries where motor functions remain intact.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Retrospective nature of the study
  • 2
    Limited amount of collected data
  • 3
    Subjective assessments could be influenced by medications and changes in mood

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury