Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the trunk control test for individuals with spinal cord injury

Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the trunk control test for individuals with spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 2022 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-022-00502-0 · Published: February 28, 2022

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitationResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study assessed the reliability of two trunk function tests, the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the trunk control test (TCT-SCI), for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Reliability refers to how consistently these tests measure trunk function. The researchers used video recordings of individuals with SCI performing the tests, and two physical therapists independently scored the videos. This helped determine how well the therapists agreed on the scores, which is a measure of inter-rater reliability. The study also calculated the minimal detectable change (MDC) for each test. The MDC represents the smallest change in score that is considered a real change in trunk function, rather than just a measurement error.

Study Duration
December 2019 to March 2021
Participants
9 adult individuals with SCI (AIS A to D)
Evidence Level
Cross-sectional study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Both the TASS and TCT-SCI showed excellent inter-rater reliability, meaning that different therapists were likely to give similar scores. The ICC for TASS was 0.99 and for TCT-SCI it was 1.00.
  • 2
    The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the TASS total score was 4.07 points, while the MDC for the TCT-SCI total score was 1.13 points. This means that changes less than these values may be due to measurement error.
  • 3
    One item on each scale (TASS item 6 and TCT-SCI item 3) had lower inter-rater agreement than the other items. The kappa coefficients of TASS was below acceptable for 1 item (κ = 0.62) and The kappa coefficients of TCT-SCI was below acceptable for 1 item (κ = 0.68)

Research Summary

This study evaluated the reliability and measurement error of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the Trunk Control Test for Spinal Cord Injury (TCT-SCI) in individuals with SCI. The results indicated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for both scales, suggesting they can be consistently used by different therapists to assess trunk function in individuals with SCI. However, one item in each scale showed lower inter-rater agreement. The study also determined the minimal detectable change (MDC) for each scale, providing clinicians with a benchmark for interpreting meaningful changes in patient scores. Differences of less than four points in TASS and one point in TCT-SCI were interpreted as measurement errors between the two raters.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

TASS and TCT-SCI can be reliably used by clinicians to assess trunk function in SCI patients.

Research

The MDC values can be used to determine if interventions have a meaningful impact on trunk function.

Scale Refinement

Consideration should be given to revising TASS item 6 and TCT-SCI item 3 to improve inter-rater agreement.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size (n=9)
  • 2
    Participants were recruited from a single institution
  • 3
    Validity and responsiveness of the TASS have not yet been confirmed

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury