Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2020 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033 · Published: January 1, 2020

Spinal Cord InjuryUrologyGastroenterology

Simple Explanation

Advancing best practices for managing neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) issues has been slow due to a lack of standardized evaluation methods. The recommendations in this manuscript address this issue and evolved from a series of collaborative, community-based meetings with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) stakeholders. This working group aimed to identify and evaluate clinical measures and datasets used for NBB in SCI/D, recommending a minimum set of self-reported measures (SRMs) for interventional studies.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Experts in SCI/D
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    The study identified 15 clinical assessment modalities for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel in SCI/D.
  • 2
    Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D.
  • 3
    Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.

Research Summary

This article provides readers with recommendations for clinical and diagnostic tools and measures including SRMs and datasets currently available for use. We describe measurement properties, suggested use based on study type or element of clinical interest, and provide recommendations for CDE inclusion. Two measures were rated as Supplemental-Highly recommended.

Practical Implications

Standardized Assessment

The recommendations promote the use of standardized tools for evaluating NBB dysfunction, enhancing the ability to compare results across different clinical research studies.

Improved Treatment

By using a combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective), clinicians and researchers can better capture changes related to NBB and develop more effective treatments.

Future Research

The inclusion of NBB data in studies focusing on other SCI/D complications could provide new insights into treatments and improve patient outcomes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    [object Object]
  • 2
    [object Object]
  • 3
    [object Object]

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury