Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Neurogenic Bladder and Urodynamic Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Cord Myelopathy

Neurogenic Bladder and Urodynamic Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Cord Myelopathy

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2015 · DOI: 10.1310/sci2103-250 · Published: July 3, 2015

Spinal Cord InjuryUrology

Simple Explanation

Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is a common complication following spinal cord damage. It is associated with an increased risk of long-term complications, such as urinary incontinence, urinary tract infection, urinary reflux, hydronephrosis, and renal impairment. Patients with nontraumatic spinal cord myelopathy (SCM) – caused by conditions such as malignancy, infections, degenerative conditions resulting in cord compression, and spinal cord infarction – are typically managed in a wide range of settings and are much less likely to be admitted to a specialist spinal rehabilitation unit. The primary objective of this project was to study the neurogenic bladder functioning and UD findings in patients admitted to a spinal rehabilitation service with a diagnosis of SCM. The secondary objectives were to assess whether the recommendations made following UDs resulted in a clinically important change to the patient’s bladder management and to determine whether the recommendations made as a result of the UDs were followed.

Study Duration
January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2010
Participants
65 Urodynamic tests performed on SCM patients
Evidence Level
Retrospective case study

Key Findings

  • 1
    The most common UD finding was overactive detrusor with no dysynergia (n = 31; 48%), followed by overactive detrusor with sphincter dysynergia (n = 16; 25%) and detrusor areflexia/underactive (n = 12; 18%).
  • 2
    Key UD findings were median cystometric capacity 414 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 300-590), median maximum detrusor contraction 49.5 cmH2O (IQR, 25-85), and median residual volume post voiding 100 mL (IQR, 5-200).
  • 3
    The recommendations for changes to bladder management following UDs resulted in clinically important changes to existing strategies in 57 studies (88%).

Research Summary

This retrospective case study examined a series of SCM patients admitted to a spinal rehabilitation service who underwent UDs between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2010. Sixty-five UD tests were performed a median of 7 months post SCM. Most (n = 34; 57%) patients were male, and the median age was 60 years. The recommendations for changes to bladder management following UDs resulted in clinically important changes to existing strategies in 57 studies (88%).

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

Urodynamic studies are valuable for guiding bladder management in SCM patients, even those who void on sensation or are catheter-free.

Future Research

Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal screening protocols and long-term outcomes of UD-guided bladder management in SCM patients.

Resource Allocation

Efforts should be made to address resource constraints that limit access to timely UDs for all SCM patients, given the potential for unrecognized bladder abnormalities.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Retrospective study design
  • 2
    Selection bias: only high-risk patients underwent UDs
  • 3
    Incomplete long-term follow-up

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury