Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Nature of the Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Literature: A Systematic Review

Nature of the Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Literature: A Systematic Review

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2017 · DOI: 10.1310/sci2304-353 · Published: January 1, 2017

Spinal Cord InjuryResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study investigates the quality and quantity of clinical Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (NTSCI) evidence published in peer-reviewed literature. The review covers prognosis, diagnosis, intervention, process of care, methodology, and qualitative approaches within NTSCI research. The systematic review of NTSCI literature aims to form a global hypothesis about the quality and quantity of research evidence.

Study Duration
1997-2016 (20 years)
Participants
Not specified
Evidence Level
Systematic Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    Prognostics had adequate data yield for evidence synthesis, with 4.8% ranked level 1A or 11A.
  • 2
    Notable evidence gaps were identified in qualitative, methodological, and diagnostic domains.
  • 3
    Therapeutic approaches require an evidence-based understanding of the distinct contexts in which NTSCI occurs, especially in less resourced settings.

Research Summary

The study aimed to investigate the quality and quantity of clinical NTSCI evidence published in peer-reviewed journals, covering various research domains. The review identified gaps in qualitative, methodological, and diagnostic domains and emphasized the need for evidence-based understanding in NTSCI therapeutic approaches. Findings underscored the necessity for qualitative and quantitative research on the occurrence of NTSCI in all contexts, particularly in less resourced settings.

Practical Implications

Need for Targeted Research

More qualitative and quantitative research is needed on NTSCI, especially in under-resourced areas.

Improve Therapeutic Approaches

Develop evidence-based therapeutic strategies that account for the specific contexts of NTSCI.

Standardized Taxonomy Integration

Integrate the standardized NTSCI taxonomy with currency and evidence from diverse resource settings.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    English language filter introduces systematic bias
  • 2
    Limited to two OVID databases
  • 3
    Bibliography, registry, and secondary searches were not conducted

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury