Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Improvements in bladder, bowel and sexual outcomes following task-specific locomotor training in human spinal cord injury

Improvements in bladder, bowel and sexual outcomes following task-specific locomotor training in human spinal cord injury

PLoS ONE, 2018 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190998 · Published: January 31, 2018

Spinal Cord InjuryUrologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study investigates whether locomotor training (LT) can improve bladder, bowel, and sexual function in humans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The study enrolled eight SCI research participants who were undergoing locomotor training (LT) on a treadmill using body-weight support. Urodynamic assessments were performed and International Data Set questionnaire forms completed for bladder, bowel and sexual functions at pre-and post-training time points. Four usual care (non-trained; regular at-home routine) research participants were also enrolled in this study and had the same assessments collected twice, at least 3 months apart. The results suggest that locomotor training can positively benefit the neural circuitries controlling urogenital and bowel functions. These results underscore the power of LT for not only motor rehabilitation but for the benefit of multiple non-locomotor systems, including those involving autonomic functions.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
8 SCI research participants (locomotor training) and 4 usual care participants
Evidence Level
Level 2; Prospective cohort study, pilot trial with small sample size

Key Findings

  • 1
    Filling cystometry documented significant increases in bladder capacity, voiding efficiency and detrusor contraction time as well as significant decreases in voiding pressure post-training relative to baseline.
  • 2
    Questionnaires revealed a decrease in the frequency of nocturia and urinary incontinence for several research participants as well as a significant decrease in time required for defecation and a significant increase in sexual desire post-training.
  • 3
    Novel sensations below lesion post-training in one AIS A research participant suggests the existence and perhaps training-induced activation of dormant intact axons traversing the lesion.

Research Summary

This pilot trial suggests that task-specific locomotor training (LT) can improve bladder, bowel, and sexual outcomes in humans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The study involved eight SCI participants undergoing LT and four usual care participants. The LT group showed significant improvements in bladder capacity, voiding efficiency, detrusor contraction time, and reduced voiding pressure. Questionnaires revealed decreased nocturia and urinary incontinence, reduced defecation time, and increased sexual desire. These findings suggest that sensory information from task-specific stepping and/or loading can positively impact the neural circuits controlling urogenital and bowel functions, highlighting the potential of LT for both motor and autonomic rehabilitation.

Practical Implications

Improved Bladder Management

Locomotor training may help improve bladder capacity and voiding efficiency, potentially reducing the need for frequent catheterization and medication.

Enhanced Bowel Function

Locomotor training can significantly reduce the time required for defecation, improving the quality of life for individuals with SCI.

Increased Sexual Desire

Locomotor training may lead to increased sexual desire, improving overall sexual health and satisfaction in SCI patients.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size
  • 2
    Lack of a fully matched control group
  • 3
    Limited data on long-term maintenance of improvements

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury