Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Evaluation of spinal cord injury animal models

Evaluation of spinal cord injury animal models

Neural Regeneration Research, 2014 · DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.143436 · Published: November 1, 2014

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a significant health problem that leads to permanent disability and imposes financial burdens on families and society. Because there is no curative treatment for SCI, researchers use animal models to study the injury mechanisms and develop potential therapies. This article reviews different types of animal models used to study SCI. These models include contusion, compression, traction, ischemia-reperfusion, photochemical-induced, and inflammatory injury models. Each model has advantages and disadvantages in mimicking human SCI. The ideal model should simulate clinical SCI, be reproducible, and involve simple techniques with straightforward equipment.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Rats, mice, dogs, rabbits, pigs, and nonhuman primates
Evidence Level
Reviews

Key Findings

  • 1
    Rodent models offer advantages such as well-described methods for reproducible SCI and widely available behavioral outcome measures. However, clinical trials based on rodent studies have often failed to demonstrate convincing efficacy, potentially due to differences between rodent and human SCI.
  • 2
    Contusion and compression injuries are common in both experimental and clinical SCI, but experimental injuries are frequently induced dorsally in the thoracic spine, while clinical injuries often occur anteriorly in the cervical region.
  • 3
    Accurate measurement of fine motor and sensory function in animals, especially in rodents, is difficult. Treatment effectiveness in animals with SCI is often measured simply by whether or not independent ambulation has occurred.

Research Summary

This article systematically reviews and analyzes various kinds of animal models of spinal cord injury and assesses their advantages and disadvantages for further studies. SCI animal models, including the contusive, compressive, tractive, photochemical-induced, inflammatory injury, and ischemia-reperfusion injury models have been mostly used for investigating the pathophysiology of SCI. Several major problems still exist in understanding SCI in animal models and humans: (1) the lack of anatomical and pathophysiological correlation between experimental SCI and clinical SCI; (2) lack of congruent SCI pathology between different species and strains; (3) difficulties in interpreting outcomes measured in animals.

Practical Implications

Standardization of Models

Standardizing species and strains used in SCI research is crucial for improving comparability between studies.

Improvement of Behavioral Tests

Refining environmental conditions and laboratory procedures may diminish difficulties in performing and interpreting behavioral tests.

Translation to Clinical Trials

Using an animal SCI model that is an intermediary between both a rodent and human SCI may be a valuable translational research resource for pre-clinically evaluating novel therapies.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Lack of anatomical and pathophysiological correlation between experimental SCI and clinical SCI
  • 2
    Lack of congruent SCI pathology between different species and strains
  • 3
    Difficulties in interpreting outcomes measured in animals

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury