Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Acutely Modulates Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Function Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report

Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Acutely Modulates Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Function Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report

Frontiers in Physiology, 2018 · DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01816 · Published: December 18, 2018

Spinal Cord InjuryUrologyGastroenterology

Simple Explanation

This case report explores whether epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) can modulate autonomic circuits involved in lower urinary tract and bowel control after spinal cord injury (SCI). The study presents the case of a 32-year-old man with a chronic motor-complete SCI who was suffering from neurogenic lower urinary tract and bowel dysfunction. The individual's bowel function was assessed using different pre-set configurations and stimulation parameters in a randomized order. Compared to the individual’s conventional bowel management approach, ESCS significantly reduced the time needed for bowel management. Depending on electrode configuration and stimulation parameters, ESCS modulated detrusor pressure and external anal sphincter/pelvic floor muscle tone to various degrees during urodynamic investigation. The data suggest that this neuroprosthetic intervention may provide benefit to lower urinary tract and bowel function in individuals with SCI.

Study Duration
1 month
Participants
A 32-year-old man with chronic motor-complete SCI
Evidence Level
Level 4: Case Report

Key Findings

  • 1
    ESCS significantly reduced the time needed for bowel management compared to conventional bowel management (p = 0.039).
  • 2
    ESCS modulated detrusor pressure and external anal sphincter/pelvic floor muscle tone to various degrees during urodynamic investigation depending on electrode configuration and stimulation parameters.
  • 3
    ESCS decreased the severity of neurogenic bowel dysfunction from severe to minor as evidenced by a reduction in NDB Score from 15 to 8, as well as improved the general satisfaction scale from 5 to 8.

Research Summary

This case report investigated the effect of epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) on lower urinary tract and bowel function in an individual with motor-complete SCI. The participant, a 32-year-old man, had a history of autonomic dysfunction, including neurogenic lower urinary tract and bowel dysfunction. Results showed that ESCS modulated lower urinary tract and bowel function to varying degrees, depending on electrode configuration and stimulation parameters. Notably, ESCS significantly reduced the time required for bowel management compared to conventional methods. The study suggests that ESCS can activate autonomic and motor spinal cord circuits that affect lower urinary tract, external anal sphincter/pelvic floor, and bowel function in individuals after chronic motor-complete SCI, offering a potential therapeutic option for improving these crucial functions.

Practical Implications

Therapeutic Potential

ESCS may offer a viable therapeutic option for improving lower urinary tract and bowel function in individuals with SCI.

Improved Bowel Management

ESCS can significantly reduce the time required for bowel management, improving the quality of life for individuals with SCI.

Further Research

Further mechanistic research is crucial to truly understand these effects on bowel function and optimize stimulation parameters.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Single case report limits generalizability
  • 2
    Study did not investigate the effect of ESCS alone on bowel function, as suppository insertion was the starting point of assessment
  • 3
    Underlying mechanisms for the observed improvements were not determined.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury