Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Effects of cervical rotatory manipulation on the cervical spinal cord: a finite element study

Effects of cervical rotatory manipulation on the cervical spinal cord: a finite element study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2021 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02885-6 · Published: December 14, 2021

Spinal Cord InjuryOrthopedicsBiomechanics

Simple Explanation

This study explores the biomechanical effects of cervical rotatory manipulation (CRM) on the spinal cord using a computer model. The model simulates CRM in flexion, extension, and neutral positions to observe stress distribution and spinal cord positioning. The findings suggest that CRM in the flexion position is less likely to injure the spinal cord compared to extension or neutral positions, but caution is advised if posterior vertebral osteophytes or disc herniations exist.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
One healthy male volunteer (32 years old)
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Lower von Mises stress was observed on the spinal cord after CRM in the flexion position, indicating reduced stress.
  • 2
    The spinal cord had a smaller sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area after CRM in flexion and neutral positions.
  • 3
    The spinal cord was anteriorly positioned after CRM in flexion, while posteriorly positioned after CRM in extension and neutral positions.

Research Summary

The study investigates the biomechanical and kinematic effects of cervical rotatory manipulation (CRM) on the spinal cord using a finite element model. The model simulated CRM in flexion, extension, and neutral positions, analyzing stress distribution, spinal cord shape, and position. Results suggest that CRM in the flexion position is less likely to cause spinal cord injury but requires caution in the presence of posterior vertebral osteophytes or disc herniations.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

CRM should be used cautiously in patients with disc herniation or vertebral osteophytes around the C1-C2 segments due to increased stress in these areas during CRM.

Treatment Choice

CRM in the flexion position may be a safer option due to lower stress on the spinal cord and more free space in the vertebral canal, provided there are no posterior vertebral osteophytes or disc herniations.

Pre-screening Importance

Detailed medical history, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation are crucial before performing CRM to identify potential risks, such as disc herniation or ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    [object Object]
  • 2
    [object Object]
  • 3
    [object Object]

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury