Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation using a paddle‑type lead placed at the appropriate site for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury in patients with past spinal surgical histories: study protocol for an exploratory clinical trial

Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation using a paddle‑type lead placed at the appropriate site for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury in patients with past spinal surgical histories: study protocol for an exploratory clinical trial

Trials, 2023 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07433-7 · Published: June 5, 2023

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyPain Management

Simple Explanation

This study aims to see if a new type of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), called differential target multiplexed (DTM) stimulation, can help people with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) who have had spinal surgery before. The study will use a paddle-type lead placed on the rostral side of the SCI, which researchers believe is a more effective location than the caudal side where leads are often placed in patients with prior surgeries. The trial involves two steps: first, a temporary SCS trial to test the effectiveness of DTM stimulation versus conventional tonic stimulation; second, implantation of a permanent SCS system if the trial shows promising results.

Study Duration
3 to 5 years
Participants
10 patients with intractable neuropathic pain after traumatic or non-traumatic SCI with histories of spinal surgery
Evidence Level
Level 1: Randomized, two-way crossover, exploratory trial

Key Findings

  • 1
    The primary outcome will be the rate of pain improvement, defined as a 33% or greater reduction in pain scores, three months after SCS system implantation.
  • 2
    Secondary outcomes include evaluating the effectiveness of DTM versus tonic stimulation during the SCS trial, changes in pain, mental health, and gait function over 24 months.
  • 3
    The study also aims to identify preoperative factors associated with long-term effectiveness of SCS and to assess whether gait function improves with SCS.

Research Summary

This study protocol outlines a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial to investigate the efficacy of differential target multiplexed (DTM) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) in patients with past spinal surgical histories. The trial involves a two-step procedure: an initial SCS trial using cylinder-type leads placed on the caudal side of the SCI, followed by SCS system implantation with a paddle-type lead placed on the rostral side of the SCI in patients who respond to the trial or agree to implantation. The primary outcome is the rate of achieving pain improvement (≥ 33% reduction in VAS score) at 3 months post-implantation, with secondary outcomes including comparisons of DTM and tonic stimulation, changes in assessment scores over 24 months, and identification of factors associated with long-term effectiveness.

Practical Implications

Improved Pain Management

DTM stimulation using a paddle-type lead may provide significant pain relief for patients with intractable neuropathic pain after SCI who have had previous spinal surgeries.

Optimized SCS Lead Placement

Placing the paddle-type lead on the rostral side of the SCI, as opposed to the caudal side often used in patients with surgical histories, may lead to better outcomes.

Personalized Treatment Strategies

Identifying preoperative factors associated with long-term success can help clinicians tailor treatment approaches and select appropriate candidates for SCS.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Single-center study
  • 2
    Small sample size (n=10)
  • 3
    Open-label design may introduce bias

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury