Neurosurgical Review, 2025 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03136-y · Published: January 1, 2025
This study compares the effectiveness of DREZotomy, a surgical procedure, in treating neuropathic pain for patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) versus cauda equina injuries (CEI). It examines whether DREZotomy provides better pain relief for one group over the other. The study found that while both groups experienced pain improvement initially, CEI patients reported significantly better long-term pain reduction compared to SCI patients. This suggests DREZotomy may be a more effective long-term solution for CEI-related neuropathic pain. The research also highlights that patients with 'border zone pain' (localized pain with clear boundaries) experienced better long-term relief than those with 'diffuse pain' (widespread pain). This indicates that the type of pain distribution affects DREZotomy's success.
CEI patients with neuropathic pain are better candidates for DREZotomy than SCI patients.
Border zone pain predicts favorable DREZotomy outcomes, while diffuse pain indicates a poorer prognosis.
SCI patients with diffuse pain may benefit more from neuromodulation or intrathecal drug delivery instead of DREZotomy.