Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care to Improve Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-CARE Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care to Improve Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-CARE Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Journal of Neurotrauma, 2023 · DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0200 · Published: December 1, 2023

Spinal Cord InjuryMental HealthRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This research investigates whether a coordinated healthcare approach, called collaborative care (CC), is more effective than standard care (UC) for improving the well-being of outpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Collaborative care involves a care manager who helps patients manage pain, depression, and physical activity by providing assessment, coordination, support, and brief psychological interventions. The study compared collaborative care to usual care in 174 SCI outpatients. Participants in the collaborative care group received up to 12 sessions with a care manager, while those in the usual care group received standard medical and rehabilitation care. The primary goal was to see if collaborative care improved the patients' quality of life. The results showed that while there was no significant difference in overall quality of life, collaborative care led to significant improvements in pain interference and depression symptoms compared to usual care. This suggests that collaborative care is a promising model for managing chronic conditions like pain and depression in SCI patients.

Study Duration
4 months treatment phase, 8 months follow-up
Participants
174 outpatients with spinal cord injury
Evidence Level
Level 1, Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Findings

  • 1
    There was a non-significant trend for greater improvement in quality of life in the collaborative care group versus the usual care group at 4 months.
  • 2
    Those receiving collaborative care reported significantly greater improvement in pain interference at 4- and 8-months and in depression at 4-months compared to usual care.
  • 3
    There was no significant effect on physical activity between the collaborative care and usual care groups.

Research Summary

This study evaluated the effectiveness of collaborative care (CC) compared to usual care (UC) in improving quality of life, pain, depression, and physical activity in outpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The results indicated a non-significant trend towards greater improvement in quality of life with CC at 4 months. However, CC significantly improved pain interference at 4 and 8 months and depression at 4 months. The study concludes that CC is a promising model for integrated medical and psychological care in SCI, particularly for managing chronic disabling conditions such as pain and depression.

Practical Implications

Integrated Care Delivery

Collaborative care can be implemented in outpatient SCI settings to provide integrated medical and psychological care, improving management of chronic conditions.

Pain Management

Collaborative care is effective in reducing pain interference, a critical aspect of chronic pain management in SCI patients.

Mental Health Support

The collaborative care model can improve depression severity among SCI patients, highlighting the importance of addressing mental health needs in this population.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The trial was carried out in two specialty SCI clinics within a single academic medical center, limiting generalizability.
  • 2
    The sample was predominantly male, White, and non-Hispanic, further restricting generalizability.
  • 3
    The study measured relatively short-term outcomes, and research is needed on the longer-term effectiveness of CC.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury