Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Clinical utility during inpatient rehabilitation of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation prognosis following spinal cord injury

Clinical utility during inpatient rehabilitation of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation prognosis following spinal cord injury

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2023 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1888024 · Published: May 1, 2023

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitationResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This study evaluates how useful a tool called the van Middendorp clinical prediction rule (CPR) is for physical therapists working with patients who have spinal cord injuries or disorders (SCI/D) during their inpatient rehabilitation. The CPR helps predict the likelihood of a patient being able to walk a year after their injury. The study found that the CPR was more helpful for therapists with less experience and for patients with non-traumatic SCI/D. However, the CPR's predictions didn't always match what happened during rehabilitation, suggesting that therapists need to use their own judgment along with the CPR. Ultimately, the research suggests that while tools like the CPR can be useful, especially for less experienced therapists or those working with specific patient groups, they should not replace a therapist's own clinical expertise and should be used in combination with other factors.

Study Duration
Between October 1, 2015 and September 1, 2017
Participants
52 patients (8 non-traumatic SCI/D)
Evidence Level
Observational study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Clinical utility was reported for 45% of those with SCI and 88% with non-traumatic SCI/D.
  • 2
    Therapists with less experience were more likely to report clinical utility and share with their patients.
  • 3
    CPR probability was correlated with discharge FIM only for non-traumatic SCI/D.

Research Summary

This study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the van Middendorp clinical prediction rule (CPR) among physical therapists working with individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. The CPR was not predictive of inpatient rehabilitation outcomes, in fact outcomes varied widely for individuals with similar probabilities emphasizing the importance of clinical judgement and continued need to identify individual factors that affect ambulation. However, greater utility in establishing prognosis and goal setting was noted for clinicians with less experience and for individuals with non-traumatic SCI/D.

Practical Implications

Targeted Training

The CPR may be particularly useful for less experienced clinicians in establishing prognosis and setting goals for patients with SCI/D.

Individualized Approach

Clinical judgment remains crucial, as outcomes can vary widely even with similar CPR probabilities.

Further Research

Continued research is needed to identify individual factors that affect ambulation outcomes, potentially leading to more refined prediction rules.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    This data set does not include 1-year outcomes, which are the target of the van Middendorp CPR.
  • 2
    Data was not collected for individuals who did not meet inclusion criteria for the study.
  • 3
    Comparisons were made based on clinician level of experience; however, only 5 clinicians were included in the study.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury