Characterizing Natural Recovery after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2021 · DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7473 · Published: May 1, 2021

Spinal Cord Injury Neurology Research Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This article reviews and combines data from various studies to understand how people recover neurologically after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). It focuses on data where a specific definition of sacral sparing was used to determine the completeness of the injury. The review looks at factors like age, gender, and the type of injury (penetrating vs. blunt) to see how they affect recovery. The ISNCSCI and AIS are the most common tools used to predict outcomes after SCI. The review also discusses the importance of consistent and accurate classification of SCI using the ISNCSCI and AIS, and the impact of training on classification accuracy.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

Thousands of patients with traumatic SCI (data synthesized from multiple sources)

Evidence Level

Review and synthesis of published data

Key Findings

1
Conversion from complete to incomplete injury is more common in tetraplegia than paraplegia.
2
The majority of AIS conversion and motor recovery occurs within the ﬁrst 6–9 months, with the most rapid rate of motor recovery occurring in the ﬁrst three months after injury.
3
Older age has a negative impact on neurological and functional recovery after SCI.

Research Summary

This article reviews and synthesizes published data on neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), focusing on studies that used the sacral sparing definition for determining injury completeness. The review highlights the importance of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) in predicting outcomes after SCI. Factors influencing recovery, such as the level and completeness of the injury, patient age, injury mechanism, and the presence of a zone of partial preservation, are also discussed.

Practical Implications

Improved Prognosis

The review provides a detailed understanding of natural neurological recovery after SCI, which can help clinicians provide more accurate prognoses to patients and their families.

Clinical Trial Design

Knowledge of natural recovery patterns is essential for designing clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of treatment interventions for SCI.

Rehabilitation Strategies

Understanding the factors that influence neurological recovery can help clinicians develop individualized rehabilitation programs tailored to the specific needs of each patient.

Study Limitations

1
Heterogeneity of SCI (e.g., injury level, severity, etiology)
2
Limitations of the ISNCSCI and AIS, such as ceiling effects and potential for misclassification
3
Insufficient data to support gender having a major effect on neurological recovery after SCI

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury