Cancer Medicine, 2024 · DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6845 · Published: January 1, 2024
This study investigates how spinal cord compression (SCC) in metastatic prostate cancer (MPC) is managed differently between teaching hospitals (TH) and non-teaching hospitals (NTH) in the United States. The study found that patients in teaching hospitals were more likely to receive intervention, such as radiation or surgery, compared to those in non-teaching hospitals. Additionally, the study noted that the type of insurance and racial background were associated with different treatment approaches for spinal cord compression in metastatic prostate cancer patients.
The study highlights the need for standardized management protocols for spinal cord compression in metastatic prostate cancer to ensure consistent care regardless of the hospital setting.
Further investigation is needed to understand and address the disparities in treatment based on race and insurance status, ensuring equitable access to optimal care.
The findings can inform decision-making processes for patients and healthcare providers, promoting patient-centered care and improving outcomes for individuals with metastatic prostate cancer and spinal cord compression.