Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. What Is Being Trained? How Divergent Forms of Plasticity Compete To Shape Locomotor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury

What Is Being Trained? How Divergent Forms of Plasticity Compete To Shape Locomotor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2017 · DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4562 · Published: May 15, 2017

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyNeuroplasticity

Simple Explanation

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often leads to motor and sensory system dysfunction, resulting in paralysis, sensory changes, and pain. Effective rehabilitation strategies are challenging due to the multifaceted nature of SCI. Researchers are exploring the potential of spinal cord plasticity to improve locomotor recovery. Intensive training post-SCI can improve lower extremity function by engaging the spinal cord's locomotor circuitry. Appropriate sensory input is crucial for adaptive plasticity, while inappropriate input can lead to maladaptive effects like pain and spasticity. This review examines parameters that foster adaptive plasticity and those that produce maladaptive plasticity, which hinders neurorehabilitation. It also discusses the timing of afferent input after SCI to promote locomotor recovery and suggests a synaptic mechanism for maladaptive plasticity.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Preclinical and clinical SCI models
Evidence Level
Review of preclinical and clinical studies

Key Findings

  • 1
    Adaptive spinal training requires adequate and appropriate afferent input to modulate spinal circuitry, like the central pattern generator (CPG), for rhythmic locomotor activities with proprioceptive and sensory feedback.
  • 2
    Maladaptive plasticity, such as hyper-reflexia and chronic central pain, can spontaneously emerge after SCI and undermine common adaptive rehabilitation methods.
  • 3
    Targeting synaptic mechanisms of intraspinal changes, like CP-AMPAR activity, has the potential to reverse maladaptive plasticity and improve locomotor recovery.

Research Summary

This review discusses how intensive training after SCI can improve lower extremity function by utilizing the spinal cord's intrinsic plasticity and engaging innate locomotor circuitry. The review highlights the importance of appropriate afferent input for adaptive plasticity and the potential for inappropriate input to induce maladaptive plasticity, which can hinder neurorehabilitation efforts. The authors conclude by suggesting a potential synaptic mechanism for maladaptive plasticity after SCI and propose a pharmacological target for restoring adaptive spinal plasticity.

Practical Implications

Optimizing Neurorehabilitation

Careful monitoring and manipulation of kinematic, sensory, and loading force information are crucial for optimizing training outcomes after SCI.

Targeting Maladaptive Plasticity

Identifying and targeting the synaptic mechanisms of maladaptive plasticity, such as CP-AMPAR activity, could improve locomotor recovery.

Timing of Interventions

Understanding the timing of initiating exposure to afferent input after SCI is essential for promoting functional locomotor recovery and avoiding maladaptive changes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Limited effectiveness of neurorehabilitation in current settings.
  • 2
    Early onset training benefit remains controversial.
  • 3
    Question of timing and specific afferent input required for precision neurorehabilitation after SCI remains open.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury