Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Understanding stand-to-sit maneuver: Implications for motor system neuroprostheses after paralysis

Understanding stand-to-sit maneuver: Implications for motor system neuroprostheses after paralysis

J Rehabil Res Dev, 2014 · DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.12.0264 · Published: January 1, 2014

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study examines how people with and without spinal cord injuries perform the stand-to-sit (STS) maneuver. It focuses on the challenges of controlling the lowering of the body when sitting down, especially for those using neuroprostheses. The research highlights that individuals with spinal cord injuries who use neuroprostheses rely more on their upper limbs during the STS, leading to higher impact forces when they sit. This increased reliance can pose risks to their upper body. The findings suggest a need for improved neuroprosthetic systems that can better control the descent during sitting, reducing impact and promoting a smoother, more natural movement to minimize the potential for injuries.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
5 nondisabled individuals and 5 users of an implanted neuroprosthesis
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Neuroprosthesis users relied heavily on their upper limbs during STS, with peak supporting forces approximately 25% body weight.
  • 2
    SCI subjects exhibited an average vertical acceleration at the impact six times higher than that of the nondisabled subjects (p < 0.001).
  • 3
    Sitting with stimulation resulted in impact forces at initial contact with the seating surface averaging 1.4 times body weight.

Research Summary

The study compares the biomechanics of the stand-to-sit (STS) maneuver between nondisabled individuals and those with spinal cord injury (SCI) using neuroprostheses, revealing significant differences in upper-limb force, vertical acceleration, and impact force. Individuals with SCI using neuroprostheses exhibit greater reliance on upper limbs, leading to higher impact forces and vertical acceleration during sitting compared to nondisabled controls, indicating a need for improved control strategies. The open-loop ramp down stimulation pattern used in SCI subjects may not adequately control descent, suggesting the potential benefit of closed-loop control, knee flexor stimulation, or external orthoses to improve the STS maneuver.

Practical Implications

Improved Neuroprosthesis Design

Develop neuroprostheses with better control of eccentric contractions to reduce reliance on upper limbs and minimize impact forces.

Personalized Stimulation Patterns

Optimize stimulation patterns for individual users, potentially including knee flexor stimulation to prevent knee locking and improve descent control.

Combined FNS and Orthotic Devices

Explore the use of external orthoses with knee damping in conjunction with FNS to provide a safer and more controlled STS maneuver.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Relatively small sample size
  • 2
    Variation in injury level and sensation among SCI participants
  • 3
    Use of a standard chair height without individual adjustments

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury