Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Trends and Disparities in Inpatient Rehabilitation of Adolescents: The Effect of Demographics, Injury Characteristics, and Facility Type

Trends and Disparities in Inpatient Rehabilitation of Adolescents: The Effect of Demographics, Injury Characteristics, and Facility Type

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2022 · DOI: 10.46292/sci21-00033 · Published: January 1, 2022

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitationPublic Health

Simple Explanation

This study looks at whether there are differences in how adolescents with spinal cord injuries and other conditions are treated in different types of rehabilitation centers (pediatric vs. adult). It also examines if factors like race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status affect where these adolescents receive rehabilitation. The researchers found that adolescents from marginalized backgrounds (including racial/ethnic minorities and those with Medicaid) were more likely to be admitted to adult rehabilitation facilities compared to pediatric facilities. This suggests that disparities exist within the healthcare system. The study also found that the length of stay in rehabilitation was longer for patients at the pediatric facility, suggesting that the type of facility can affect the care received. These findings highlight the need to address potential biases and systemic issues in healthcare to ensure equitable access to rehabilitation services for all adolescents.

Study Duration
2017 to 2019
Participants
96 adolescents aged 15 to 18 years
Evidence Level
Level 3: Single-center retrospective cohort study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Adolescents with SCI were more likely to undergo rehabilitation at the level 1 trauma versus pediatric facility compared to TBI patients.
  • 2
    Admission to trauma versus pediatric IRF was associated with Black compared to White race, violence compared to other etiologies of injury, and Medicaid compared to private insurance.
  • 3
    Admission to pediatric IRF was associated with longer length of stay than admission to adult IRF when adjusted for diagnosis, but Functional Independence Measures did not differ.

Research Summary

This study investigated disparities in inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) admission and outcomes for adolescents between pediatric and adult IRFs, focusing on the impact of demographics, injury characteristics, and facility type within a single healthcare system. The study found that adolescents with SCI and those experiencing systemic disadvantages, such as racism and poverty, were more likely to be admitted to trauma compared to pediatric IRFs. While length of stay (LOS) was longer at the pediatric IRF, Functional Independence Measures (FIM) did not differ significantly between the two facility types, suggesting potential differences in the rehabilitation care received.

Practical Implications

Address Institutional Bias

Healthcare systems should examine and address potential biases and institutional policies that contribute to unequal access to specialized pediatric rehabilitation for adolescents from marginalized backgrounds.

Implement Fixed Age-Based Guidelines

Consider implementing fixed age-based guidelines for determining admission to pediatric versus general IRFs to prevent racially correlated considerations and the effects of interpersonal racism and bias.

Enhance Cultural Competency Training

Provide education, antiracism training, and increase representation of underrepresented groups among rehabilitation professionals to combat health disparities.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size, particularly for adolescents with SCI.
  • 2
    Single-institution study, limiting generalizability.
  • 3
    Inability to determine the level of independence of associations between demographic and etiologic factors and IPR facility type due to correlations between race/ethnicity, insurance type, and etiology of injury.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury