Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promotes functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Wistar rats

Transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promotes functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Wistar rats

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2012 · DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2011007500162 · Published: January 16, 2012

Spinal Cord InjuryRegenerative MedicineNeurology

Simple Explanation

This study investigates the potential of using cells from human umbilical cord blood to help rats recover after a spinal cord injury. The goal was to see if these cells could improve motor function after a contusion spinal cord injury. The researchers transplanted mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood into rats with spinal cord injuries. Some rats received the cells directly at the injury site shortly after the injury, while others received the cells through a different route (cisterna magna) several days later. The results showed that rats in both transplant groups exhibited enhanced motor recovery compared to the untreated group. The transplanted cells were found to survive in the injured area for up to six weeks after the transplant.

Study Duration
6 Weeks
Participants
85 adult female Wistar rats
Evidence Level
Level II, Experimental Animal Study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promoted functional recovery in rats with spinal cord injury.
  • 2
    Both groups of transplanted rats, whether cells were administered directly into the injury site or into the cisterna magna, showed better motor recovery than the untreated group.
  • 3
    Transplanted cells survived in the injured area for 6 weeks after transplantation, suggesting their potential for long-term therapeutic effects.

Research Summary

This study evaluated the efficacy of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood in promoting functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. Cells were transplanted either directly into the injury site shortly after injury or into the cisterna magna several days later. The results indicated that both transplantation methods led to improved motor recovery compared to the control group. Functional assessments using the BBB scale showed significant improvements in hindlimb motor function, coordination, and gait in the treated groups. Immunofluorescence analysis confirmed the survival of transplanted cells in the injured spinal cord tissue for up to 6 weeks, but no evidence of cell differentiation into neural or glial cells was observed. This suggests the cells promote recovery through other mechanisms, such as paracrine effects.

Practical Implications

Potential Therapeutic Strategy

Mononuclear cell transplantation from human umbilical cord blood could be a potential therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury.

Optimal Administration Route

Further research is needed to optimize the route and timing of cell administration for maximizing therapeutic benefits.

Mechanism of Action

Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the exact mechanisms by which transplanted cells promote functional recovery, especially concerning paracrine effects and endogenous repair mechanisms.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Study conducted on rats, results may not directly translate to humans.
  • 2
    Lack of observed cell differentiation raises questions about the long-term efficacy and mechanisms of action.
  • 3
    Immunosuppression with cyclosporin-A was necessary for cell transplantation, posing potential challenges for clinical translation.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury