Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. The Relationship Between Psychological and Physical Secondary Conditions and Family Caregiver Burden in Spinal Cord Injury: A Correlational Study

The Relationship Between Psychological and Physical Secondary Conditions and Family Caregiver Burden in Spinal Cord Injury: A Correlational Study

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 2019 · DOI: 10.1310/sci2504-271 · Published: October 1, 2019

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitationSocial Support

Simple Explanation

Caregiver burden (CB) is a consequence of providing care to people with spinal cord injury (SCI). CB has been described as a multidimensional experience affecting physical, mental, and social aspects of caregiver health that contributes to a decrease in quality of life (QoL) of family members. Individuals with SCI report physical or psychological secondary conditions resulting from reduced functionality, QoL, and social participation. The prevention, treatment, or cure of secondary conditions has a significant impact on the everyday life of both caregivers and care recipients. This study indicates that the burden experienced by family caregivers of people with SCI is directly related to the extent of physical secondary complications of care recipients. Significantly higher levels of perceived burden were identified in caregivers with lower education, those whose care recipients were affected by tetraplegia and incomplete injuries, and caregivers providing support for a prolonged period.

Study Duration
March to November 2018
Participants
56 dyads of family caregivers and individuals with SCI
Evidence Level
Cross-sectional study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Caregivers with lower education showed statistically significant higher levels of burden. This was also true for those providing care for more than 3 years and those providing more than 8 hours of caregiving daily.
  • 2
    Physical complications were all correlated with at least one dimension of perceived burden. In contrast, no correlations were identified between the psychological status of care recipients and the level of burden among family caregivers.
  • 3
    Bladder dysfunction and UTIs showed correlations with all CBI-SCI dimensions, even including the developmental and physical aspects of burden. Similarly, chronic pain experienced by care recipients was weakly related to the developmental and the emotional burdens perceived by caregivers.

Research Summary

This study indicates that the burden experienced by family caregivers of people with SCI is directly related to the extent of physical secondary complications of care recipients. The evaluation and reduction of subjective burden in family caregivers is fundamental to the preservation of health and social functioning of families following life-altering SCIs. Innovative, targeted, preventative health interventions that include caregivers and care recipients are recommended to reduce caregiver burden and enhance individual and family well-being following SCI.

Practical Implications

Reduce Secondary Conditions

Reducing secondary conditions benefits not only individuals with SCI but also protects the well-being of family caregivers.

Empower Caregivers

Empowerment of caregivers may reduce secondary conditions, and health care policies and rehabilitation programs must consider the need for a two-pronged approach addressing both complications and CB.

Utilize Online Programs

The potential use of online programs for caregivers, similar to those used to improve self-management of UTIs and chronic pain in people with SCI, warrants exploration.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small number of participants
  • 2
    Cross-sectional design
  • 3
    Means of recruitment reduces the generalizability of results

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury