Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. The Hybrid Assistive Limb® intervention for a postoperative patient with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula and chronic spinal cord injury: A case study

The Hybrid Assistive Limb® intervention for a postoperative patient with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula and chronic spinal cord injury: A case study

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2018 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1329916 · Published: November 1, 2018

Spinal Cord InjuryAssistive TechnologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This case study explores the use of the Hybrid Assistive Limb® (HAL®) in a patient with chronic spinal cord injury whose condition worsened due to a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF). The HAL® is a wearable robot suit designed to aid in walking by detecting bioelectric signals and assisting joint movement. The patient, a 48-year-old man, underwent HAL® intervention twice per week for a total of 10 sessions after his condition plateaued post-surgery. The intervention aimed to improve his walking ability, which was assessed through various tests, including the 10-meter walk test (10MWT) and electromyography. The study found that the HAL® intervention improved the patient's gait speed, cadence, and muscle activation in the legs. The patient's motor scores also improved, suggesting that HAL® can be an effective tool for improving functional ambulation in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Study Duration
3 Months
Participants
One 48-year-old man with paraplegia after spinal cord injury
Evidence Level
Level 4, Case Study

Key Findings

  • 1
    The HAL® intervention improved gait speed and cadence during the 10MWT. This suggests the device can enhance walking performance in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.
  • 2
    Before the intervention, the patient's gluteus maximus (Gmax) and left quadriceps femoris (Quad) muscles were not activated. After the intervention, the right Gmax and both Quad muscles were activated rhythmically during the stance phase of gait.
  • 3
    The patient's International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) motor score improved from 14 to 16, and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) score improved from 7 to 12, indicating enhanced motor function.

Research Summary

This case report describes the use of the Hybrid Assistive Limb® (HAL®) intervention in a patient with paraplegia after spinal cord injury, whose condition deteriorated due to a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF). The patient underwent 10 HAL® sessions after his postoperative improvement plateaued. The HAL® intervention resulted in improvements in gait speed, cadence, and muscle activation. Specifically, the right gluteus maximus and both quadriceps muscles showed rhythmic activation during the stance phase of gait after the intervention. The patient's ISNCSCI motor score and WISCI II score also improved, suggesting that the HAL® can be an effective tool for improving functional ambulation in patients with chronic spinal cord injury whose postoperative recovery has plateaued.

Practical Implications

Rehabilitation Strategy

The HAL® can be an effective tool for improving functional ambulation in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Muscle Activation

HAL® contributes to rhythmical activation of both Quad and right Gmax muscles in the stance phase by providing adequate assistance according to the gait cycle.

Orthosis Adjustment

The HAL® intervention allowed the patient to change from a long leg brace to a short leg brace, indicating improved knee control.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Single case study limits generalizability
  • 2
    Short intervention period of 10 sessions
  • 3
    Subjective assessments may be biased

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury