Stronger together

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2018 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1500826 · Published: January 1, 2018

Simple Explanation

The president of the Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals (ASCIP) reflects on their experience and the importance of teamwork and leadership within the organization. The president emphasizes the importance of focusing on the common purpose of serving individuals with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) in a rapidly changing healthcare and research environment. The president expresses appreciation for the contributions of ASCIP members and invites collaboration to optimize the health and wellness of individuals with SCI/D.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

Not specified

Evidence Level

Not specified

Key Findings

1
Leadership in ASCIP is a team effort that relies on the contributions of many individuals.
2
ASCIP exists to serve individuals with SCI/D and should focus on exploring scientific possibilities to improve their health and wellness.
3
Collaboration and learning together are essential for optimizing the health and wellness of individuals with SCI/D.

Research Summary

The presidential address emphasizes the importance of teamwork and collaboration within the Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals (ASCIP). ASCIP's core purpose is to serve individuals with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D), particularly within the context of a rapidly changing healthcare landscape. The address highlights the significance of exploring scientific possibilities and continuously learning to optimize the health and wellness of individuals with SCI/D.

Practical Implications

Strengthening Collaboration

Encourages greater collaboration among professionals in spinal cord injury care and research.

Focusing on Patient Needs

Reinforces the importance of centering efforts around the needs and well-being of individuals with SCI/D.

Promoting Continuous Learning

Emphasizes the necessity of ongoing education and development within the field.

Study Limitations

1
Limited scope as a presidential address, not a research study.
2
Focuses primarily on organizational aspects rather than specific clinical findings.
3
Lacks quantitative data or empirical evidence.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury