Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Mental Health
  4. Predicting at-risk opioid use three months after ed visit for trauma: Results from the AURORA study

Predicting at-risk opioid use three months after ed visit for trauma: Results from the AURORA study

PLOS ONE, 2022 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273378 · Published: September 23, 2022

Mental HealthTrauma

Simple Explanation

This study examined the relationship between receiving opioids in the emergency department (ED) after a traumatic injury and the likelihood of at-risk opioid use within three months. At-risk opioid use was defined as either using opioids without a prescription or continuing to use prescription opioids three months after the ED visit. The study found that patients who received opioids in the ED, either through administration or prescription, had a higher chance of engaging in at-risk opioid use within three months compared to those who did not receive opioids in the ED. This suggests a potential link between initial opioid exposure in the ED and subsequent problematic opioid use. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration when prescribing or administering opioids in the ED for trauma patients. Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects of ED opioid exposure and to develop strategies for reducing the risk of at-risk opioid use.

Study Duration
3 months
Participants
872 adult patients receiving care for a traumatic event
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    ED opioid exposure, whether through prescription or administration, is associated with a higher likelihood of at-risk opioid use within three months after a traumatic event.
  • 2
    Compared to no ED opioid exposure, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for at-risk opioid use after ED opioid exposure were: ED prescription only: 4.9 (95% CI 1.4, 17.4); ED administration for analgesia only: 2.0 (CI 1.0, 3.8); both: 2.8 (CI 1.2, 6.5).
  • 3
    Any opioid exposure (prescription at discharge or in-ED administration, or both) during the ED visit was associated with a more than doubling of the odds of at-risk opioid use by the 3-month follow-up period (aOR 2.2, CI 1.3, 3.75).

Research Summary

This study aimed to determine if receiving opioids in the emergency department (ED) after a traumatic injury is associated with subsequent at-risk opioid use within three months. The researchers analyzed data from the AURORA study, a prospective cohort study of adult patients in U.S. urban EDs. The study found that ED opioid exposure (prescription or administration) was associated with increased odds of at-risk opioid use within three months. This association persisted after controlling for patient and clinical factors. The authors conclude that these results support the need for prospective studies focused on the long-term consequences of ED opioid analgesic exposure to guide therapeutic decision-making.

Practical Implications

Informed Prescribing Decisions

Clinicians should carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of opioid prescriptions in the ED setting, especially for trauma patients.

Risk Assessment

Implement strategies for identifying patients at higher risk of at-risk opioid use following ED opioid exposure.

Alternative Pain Management

Explore and promote non-opioid pain management strategies in the ED to reduce opioid exposure and subsequent risk of misuse.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Generalizability was limited to measures and sample size available from the parent study which was not specifically designed to assess opioid exposure or long-term opioid use.
  • 2
    Bias may have been introduced by our exclusion of a large number of participants with missing follow-up data and well as the voluntary aspect of research participation.
  • 3
    Our ability to assess causality is additionally limited by its observational design.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Mental Health