Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2010 · DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-43 · Published: September 10, 2010
The study investigates how different robot-assisted gait training methods affect the participation of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). It compares traditional, non-cooperative methods with patient-cooperative approaches that allow more freedom of movement. The researchers compared four training modes: position control, impedance control, and two variations of path control. The path control methods allowed patients free timing of movements and differed in the amount of additional support provided by the robot. The results showed that patient-cooperative path control, where individuals with iSCI had free timing of movements, led to more active participation and larger kinematic variability compared to non-cooperative position control.
Patient-cooperative approaches can increase patient engagement and effort during robot-assisted gait training.
Adaptive support and control strategies are needed to tailor robot-assisted therapy to individual patient needs and capabilities.
Promoting active participation and kinematic variability may lead to improved motor learning and rehabilitation outcomes for iSCI patients.