Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Participation and Life Satisfaction in Aged People with Spinal Cord Injury: Does Age at Onset Make a Difference?

Participation and Life Satisfaction in Aged People with Spinal Cord Injury: Does Age at Onset Make a Difference?

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 2015 · DOI: 10.1310/sci2103-233 · Published: July 1, 2015

Spinal Cord InjuryAgingRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study investigated participation and life satisfaction in elderly individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), examining whether the age at which the injury occurred affects these outcomes. The study compared individuals who sustained SCI before the age of 50 with those who were injured at 50 or older. The research found that individuals who experienced SCI at a younger age (before 50) reported higher levels of participation in various activities and greater life satisfaction compared to those who sustained SCI later in life. However, the study did not find evidence suggesting that aging with SCI leads to a decline in participation or life satisfaction. These findings suggest that early onset SCI may be associated with better long-term adjustment and quality of life, possibly due to factors such as greater adaptation time or more intensive rehabilitation efforts received at a younger age. The results challenge the notion of 'accelerated aging' leading to worse outcomes in those with early-onset SCI.

Study Duration
Cross-sectional
Participants
128 individuals with SCI aged 65 years or older
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Participants injured before 50 years of age reported higher participation and life satisfaction scores than participants injured at older ages, indicating a potential benefit of early-onset SCI on long-term outcomes.
  • 2
    Lower current age, higher education, and having paraplegia were significant independent determinants of increased participation, explaining 25.7% of the variance in participation scores.
  • 3
    Lower age at onset and higher education were significant independent determinants of higher life satisfaction, although the explained variance was relatively low at 15.3%.

Research Summary

This study aimed to assess the influence of age at onset of spinal cord injury (SCI) on participation and life satisfaction in individuals aged 65 years or older. It compared outcomes between those injured before and after the age of 50. The results indicated that individuals who sustained SCI at a younger age (before 50) exhibited higher levels of participation and life satisfaction compared to those injured later in life. This suggests that early onset SCI may not necessarily lead to accelerated aging and poorer outcomes. The study highlights the importance of considering age at onset when evaluating long-term outcomes in individuals with SCI and suggests that factors beyond chronological age may play a significant role in determining participation and life satisfaction.

Practical Implications

Rehabilitation Strategies

Tailor rehabilitation programs to address the specific needs of individuals with SCI based on their age at onset, focusing on promoting participation and life satisfaction from an early stage.

Long-Term Support

Provide ongoing support and resources to individuals with SCI, particularly those injured at older ages, to facilitate their engagement in meaningful activities and enhance their overall well-being.

Further Research

Conduct longitudinal studies to better understand the long-term effects of aging with SCI and to identify factors that contribute to successful adaptation and quality of life in this population.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Reliance on self-report data, which may be subject to recall bias and limited accuracy.
  • 2
    Inclusion of only members of a Dutch consumer organization, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings.
  • 3
    Cross-sectional design, which precludes the establishment of causal relationships and the examination of longitudinal effects.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury