Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of biceps voluntary activation in individuals with tetraplegia

Paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of biceps voluntary activation in individuals with tetraplegia

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2022 · DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.976014 · Published: November 3, 2022

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

After a spinal cord injury (SCI), the nervous system undergoes changes, including cortical changes, impacting muscle function. Voluntary activation, which measures the neural drive to muscles, can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, this assessment faces technical challenges, such as stimulating the target muscle relative to its antagonist. The study explores whether using paired pulse TMS, which can modify muscle responses (MEPs), and looking at the MEP ratio between biceps and triceps muscles, could improve the accuracy of voluntary activation measurements (VATMS) in individuals with tetraplegia. The research found that paired pulse TMS did not significantly affect VATMS, and the MEP ratio did not influence VATMS in either the SCI or non-impaired groups. The linearity of the relationship between voluntary moment and superimposed twitch moment was lower in the SCI group, which complicates the interpretation of VATMS results.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
10 individuals with tetraplegia and 10 non-impaired individuals
Evidence Level
Original Research

Key Findings

  • 1
    The main effect of the stimulation pulse (paired pulse compared to single pulse) on VATMS was not significant in the linear mixed-effects models in either the SCI or non-impaired groups.
  • 2
    The MEP ratio was not modulated across all effort levels and did not affect VATMS in both groups for the stimulation parameters tested.
  • 3
    Linearity of the voluntary moment and superimposed twitch moment relation was lower in SCI participants compared to non-impaired participants, limiting the interpretation of VATMS in the SCI group.

Research Summary

This study investigated the relationship between biceps VATMS and the biceps/triceps MEP ratio in individuals with C5 and C6 tetraplegia using paired pulse TMS to modulate the MEP ratio across effort levels. The study found that paired pulse TMS did not significantly increase the biceps/triceps MEP ratio across all effort levels relative to single pulse TMS, and the MEP ratio did not affect VATMS in individuals with tetraplegia. The linearity of the relationship between the voluntary moment and SIT moment was lower in the SCI group, posing a methodological limitation in the estimation of VATMS after SCI.

Practical Implications

Methodological Considerations for VATMS

Researchers should consider the linearity of the voluntary moment and SIT moment relation when interpreting VATMS results, especially in populations with SCI.

Paired Pulse TMS Parameter Optimization

Future research should focus on optimizing paired pulse TMS parameters (ISIs, conditioning, and test stimulus intensities) specific to the effort level and muscle being studied.

Motor Unit Recruitment Dynamics

Future studies should consider the altered motor unit recruitment patterns after SCI when investigating MEP modulation and VATMS.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size with a wide range of biceps strength among SCI participants.
  • 2
    Paired pulse TMS parameters were not optimized for each level of muscle activation, nor were potential differences in optimal parameters between SCI and non-impaired participants accounted for.
  • 3
    Data were not excluded based on poor linearity in the SCI group, which affects the interpretation of VATMS.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury