Outcomes of peer mentorship for people living with spinal cord injury: perspectives from members of Canadian community-based SCI organizations

Spinal Cord, 2021 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-021-00725-2 · Published: November 3, 2021

Spinal Cord Injury Social Support Public Health

Simple Explanation

Peer mentorship programs for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are common in Canada, aiming to help individuals adapt and thrive after their injury. These programs, often run by community-based SCI organizations, can address various issues such as rehabilitation, social reintegration, health improvement, and skills teaching through different approaches. This study seeks a deeper understanding of the various outcomes of these peer mentorship programs, focusing on both positive and negative aspects for both mentors and mentees.

Study Duration

Not specified

Participants

36 individuals

Evidence Level

Qualitative design

Key Findings

1
Peer mentorship programs have positive outcomes for mentees, including increased understanding, emotional support, inspiration, and a sense of belonging.
2
Mentors also experience positive outcomes like increased gratitude, confidence, pride, and personal growth through their involvement in these programs.
3
However, negative outcomes for mentors can include the emotional toll of mentorship, the impact of negativity, and the demands on their time and energy.

Research Summary

This study explores the outcomes of peer mentorship programs for people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) within Canadian community-based organizations. The research identifies both positive and negative outcomes for mentees and mentors, highlighting the importance of considering both perspectives when evaluating these programs. The findings suggest that peer mentorship is a valuable resource, and the results will be used to develop a community-friendly peer mentorship evaluation tool.

Practical Implications

Program Enhancement

Community-based SCI organizations can utilize these results to refine their peer mentorship programs to maximize positive outcomes and minimize negative impacts.

Evaluation Tool Development

The identified outcomes can inform the development of a comprehensive evaluation tool that accurately measures the impact of SCI peer mentorship programs.

Mentor Support

Organizations should implement strategies to support mentors, addressing the emotional toll and time demands associated with providing mentorship.

Study Limitations

1
Interviews were conducted via phone or Skype, potentially affecting communication.
2
The study did not differentiate by province, mentorship role, or time since engagement.
3
Few mentees reported negative outcomes, possibly due to not interviewing individuals who discontinued mentorship due to negative experiences.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury