Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. nTMS in spinal cord injury: Current evidence, challenges and a future direction

nTMS in spinal cord injury: Current evidence, challenges and a future direction

Brain and Spine, 2025 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104234 · Published: March 14, 2025

Spinal Cord InjuryNeurologyNeurorehabilitation

Simple Explanation

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) has devastating consequences for patients and their families. Over the last few decades, a renewed interest in the utilization of non-invasive and cost-effective therapeutic technologies in the management of patients with SCI has emerged. This includes stimulation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) in order to improve the outcome for these patients alongside with existing clinical tools. nTMS has shown encouraging preliminary results in both clinical assessment and rehabilitation (motor and pain) of patients with SCI. However, different protocols – stimulation parameters, length of treatment and combination with other modalities – and patient selection criteria hampered definitive conclusions. So far, none of these have been adapted in regular clinical practice.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Varied across studies (11-115). Mostly incomplete and traumatic SCIs
Evidence Level
Level 1 (RCTs) but scarce

Key Findings

  • 1
    nTMS can be used in assessment and treatment of patients with both traumatic and non-traumatic SCI. When it is being used in the assessment of SCI it can provide objective outcome measures that can add to the existing scales that are currently being used.
  • 2
    Zdunczyk et al. found for the first time that patients with a reduced corticospinal excitability (CE), prolonged cortical silence period (CSP), and restricted motor area presented with more severe symptoms and had less favourable clinical outcomes, compared to those with compensatory recruitment of non-primary motor areas as part of neuroplasticity
  • 3
    Onyiriuka et al. could demonstrate the functional cortical reorganisation in the case of a 67 year-old patient with thoracic intradural extramedullary tumour (meningioma).

Research Summary

This article provides an overview of different assessment and therapeutic strategies using nTMS and reviews their effectiveness in spinal cord injury (SCI). The review explores the current state of nTMS in rehabilitation for SCI, its role in diagnosis and prognostication of traumatic and non-traumatic SCI, and potential future applications. The conclusion emphasizes that TMS offers a useful, non-invasive treatment tool for a holistic approach to SCI, potentially improving patient care through diagnostics, prognostication, and treatment, pending further validation.

Practical Implications

Diagnostic Tool

nTMS can be used to provide objective outcome measures that can add to the existing scales that are currently being used to assess SCI.

Therapeutic Intervention

nTMS shows promise in rehabilitation, particularly in improving motor function and reducing spasticity and neuropathic pain in SCI patients.

Personalized Treatment

Integration of nTMS data into clinical algorithms may improve patient stratification and prognostication, allowing for better-targeted treatment and rehabilitation strategies.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Variability in patient cohort, treatment protocols, and neurological/functional assessments.
  • 2
    Logistical challenges in the early application of nTMS in SCI patients.
  • 3
    Inter-user variability and vastly different stimulation protocols reduce reproducibility of previous results.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury