Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Motor Scores on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) After Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Motor Scores on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) After Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Spinal Cord, 2009 · DOI: 10.1038/sc.2008.94 · Published: March 1, 2009

Spinal Cord InjuryPediatricsRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study looks at the motor function of children with spinal cord injuries (SCI) using a tool called the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). It aims to understand how well these children can perform motor tasks and what factors influence their abilities. The researchers analyzed data from 941 children with SCI, examining their FIM motor scores at admission to a hospital and the gains they made by the time of discharge. They also considered factors like the level of their injury, whether the injury was complete or incomplete, their age, the cause of the injury, and the time between the injury and admission to the hospital. The study found that children's motor function after SCI is related to the level and completeness of their injury. Importantly, it showed that children can improve their FIM motor scores with intervention, even years after the initial injury.

Study Duration
1983-2007
Participants
941 children with SCI
Evidence Level
Retrospective descriptive analysis

Key Findings

  • 1
    FIM motor scores at admission were negatively correlated with age, neurological level, and completeness of injury, indicating that older children and those with more severe injuries had lower initial scores.
  • 2
    Gain in FIM motor scores was significant across neurological levels and was associated with lower admission FIM motor scores, lower neurological level, incomplete injury, traumatic injury, and less time between injury and admission.
  • 3
    Regression analysis showed that FIM admission score and the neurological level had the strongest effects on FIM gain.

Research Summary

This study reports on the functional ability of children with spinal cord injury (SCI) as recorded on motor items of the functional independence measure (FIM) and examines factors associated with FIM motor admission and post-discharge gain scores. The study found that FIM motor scores at admission were negatively correlated with age, neurological level, and completeness of injury. Gain in FIM motor scores was significant across neurological levels, and was associated with several factors. The motor function of children after pediatric SCI depends on neurological level and completeness of injury, among other factors. FIM motor scores can improve with intervention even years after the injury.

Practical Implications

Potential for Improvement

The finding that FIM motor scores can improve with intervention even years after the injury suggests that continued rehabilitation efforts can be beneficial for children with SCI, even long after the initial injury.

Targeted Interventions

The study highlights the importance of considering neurological level and completeness of injury when planning interventions for children with SCI. Interventions should be tailored to address the specific needs and challenges associated with different injury profiles.

Prognostic Factors

The identification of factors associated with FIM gain can help clinicians to identify children who are more likely to benefit from rehabilitation and to set realistic goals for improvement.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Lack of specific information about the type of intervention provided to these children between admission and discharge.
  • 2
    The proportions of cases having a particular neurological level or specific etiology provided in this study do not necessarily reflect the proportions in the whole population of children with SCI.
  • 3
    Annual follow-up data were not examined for this study, but might show differences in FIM gains compared to those reported here.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury