Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Longitudinal changes in femur bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: effects of slice placement and peel method

Longitudinal changes in femur bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: effects of slice placement and peel method

Osteoporos Int., 2010 · DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1044-5 · Published: June 1, 2010

Spinal Cord InjuryMedical ImagingMusculoskeletal Medicine

Simple Explanation

Following spinal cord injury (SCI), disruption of normal neural, vascular, hormonal, and mechanical factors precipitates rapid bone loss in paralyzed extremities. The femur metaphysis is a transition zone between the condyles (which contain extensive trabecular bone and a thin cortical shell) and the diaphysis, a thick cortical shell with almost no trabecular bone present. Longitudinal post-SCI BMD data are scarce, but cross- sectional studies suggest that BMD decline at the femur epiphysis occurs more rapidly than at tibial sites [1].

Study Duration
2 years
Participants
15 individuals with SCI and 10 healthy adults without SCI
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    BMD demonstrated a rapid decline over 2 years post-injury.
  • 2
    BMD differences attributable to operator-selected peel methods were large (17.3% for subjects with SCI).
  • 3
    Femur metaphysis BMD declines after SCI in a manner similar to other anatomic sites.

Research Summary

Surveillance of femur metaphysis bone mineral density (BMD) decline after spinal cord injury (SCI) may be subject to slice placement error of 2.5%. Adaptations to anti-osteoporosis measures should exceed this potential source of error. Image analysis parameters likewise affect BMD output and should be selected strategically in longitudinal studies.

Practical Implications

Monitoring Error

Consider slice placement error of 2.5% when monitoring femur metaphysis BMD decline after SCI.

Treatment Threshold

Anti-osteoporosis interventions should exceed the potential slice placement error.

Strategic Analysis

Carefully select image analysis parameters in longitudinal studies to avoid skewing BMD output.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small number of subjects with SCI
  • 2
    Potential slice misplacement error during pQCT
  • 3
    Limited longitudinal data

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury