Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Trauma
  4. Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study

Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study

PLoS Medicine, 2017 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002322 · Published: July 5, 2017

TraumaResearch Methodology & DesignPublic Health

Simple Explanation

This study examined the long-term health outcomes of individuals who experienced major trauma, focusing on their recovery over three years. Researchers followed a group of 2,757 adults in Victoria, Australia, collecting data on their health status at multiple points after their injuries. The goal was to understand how well people recover from serious injuries and what factors influence their recovery. The study found that many participants continued to experience health problems three years after their injuries, highlighting that serious injury often leads to chronic conditions. Factors such as age, education level, and whether individuals were receiving compensation for their injuries significantly affected their recovery. The findings emphasize the need for greater investment in preventing major trauma and in developing interventions to support the long-term recovery of injured individuals. This includes better trauma system design, rehabilitation programs, and compensation schemes.

Study Duration
36 months
Participants
2,757 adult patients
Evidence Level
Longitudinal Cohort Study

Key Findings

  • 1
    The prevalence of ongoing problems at 3-years postinjury is high, confirming that serious injury is frequently a chronic disorder.
  • 2
    Continued improvement to 36-months postinjury was only present for the usual activities item; the adjusted relative risk (ARR) of reporting problems decreased from 6 to 12 (ARR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83–0.90), 12 to 24 (ARR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98), and 24 to 36 months (ARR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.95–0.99).
  • 3
    Three factors were important predictors of outcome for all items of the EQ-5D-3L, age, compensable status, and level of education, while the nature of injuries sustained, gender, preinjury employment, and level of socioeconomic disadvantage were important predictors of problems on many of the 5 EQ-5D-3L items.

Research Summary

This population-based longitudinal study examined the long-term health status of 2,757 adult major trauma patients in Victoria, Australia, over a 3-year period. The study used the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) to assess health outcomes at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-injury. The study found that a significant proportion of patients experienced persistent problems across various health dimensions, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, even three years after the injury. Improvement was primarily observed in usual activities, with an overall decline in the EQ-5D-3L summary score between 24 and 36 months due to increased reporting of pain or discomfort. Key predictors of poorer outcomes included older age, compensable status (claiming compensation), and lower levels of education. The study highlights the need for interventions to improve long-term recovery and reduce the impact of injuries, considering factors like trauma system design and rehabilitation programs.

Practical Implications

Trauma System Design

Findings have implications for trauma system design to address long-term needs of seriously injured patients.

Rehabilitation Programs

Highlights the need for investment in interventions designed to reduce the longer-term impact of injuries.

Primary Prevention

Greater investment in primary prevention is needed to reduce the incidence of major trauma.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Responder bias with patients injured in intentional events
  • 2
    Younger, and less seriously injured patients less likely to participate
  • 3
    These patient subgroups were underrepresented in the study findings

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Trauma