Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance

International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2016 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1180831 · Published: May 1, 2016

Spinal Cord InjuryHealthcareNeurology

Simple Explanation

The study compares the 2011 and 2013 revisions of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) worksheet. Clinicians attending ISNCSCI courses classified SCI cases before and after training, using either the 2011 or 2013 worksheet. The 2013 revision, which groups motor and sensory scores by body side, led to improved classification performance.

Study Duration
November 2011 to March 2015
Participants
125 clinicians
Evidence Level
Prospective cohort study

Key Findings

  • 1
    The 2013 worksheet revision significantly improved overall classification performance compared to the 2011 revision.
  • 2
    The percentage of correctly determined motor levels and neurological levels of injury was significantly higher with the 2013 revision.
  • 3
    The 2013 revision showed the largest benefit in cases with high cervical injuries (NLI C2).

Research Summary

This study evaluated the impact of the 2013 revision of the ISNCSCI worksheet on classification performance by comparing it to the 2011 version. The results indicated that the 2013 revision led to a statistically significant improvement in the correct determination of motor levels and neurological levels of injury. The authors conclude that the body-side based grouping of myotomes and dermatomes in the 2013 revision likely contributed to the improved classification performance.

Practical Implications

Improved Classification Accuracy

The revised ISNCSCI worksheet (2013) enhances the accuracy of neurological classification in spinal cord injury.

Training Recommendations

ISNCSCI training should emphasize the evaluation of sensory segments C2 to C4 and the 'motor follows sensory' concept.

Worksheet Design

Future revisions of the ISNCSCI worksheet should maintain the body-side based grouping of myotomes and dermatomes.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Some attendees may have been familiar with the test cases.
  • 2
    The selected ISNCSCI cases were intentionally difficult.
  • 3
    The cases do not reflect a typical SCI cohort found in clinical trials.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury