Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2019 · DOI: 10.1310/sci18-00019 · Published: August 7, 2018
This research identifies and classifies tools used to measure the impact of neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) on the quality of life (QoL) for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). It categorizes these tools as either objective (societal viewpoint) or subjective (personal viewpoint) based on Dijkers’ theoretical QoL framework. The study found 13 tools that assess the influence of NBD on QoL in SCI patients. The Health Utility Index (HUI-III) was identified as the only tool providing data on “QoL as utility,” while the validated NBD score was the only condition-specific tool assessing QoL as “subjective well-being.” The review emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate QoL tools to accurately measure individual progress and treatment effects on QoL, which can inform practice and policy related to resource allocation for bowel care post SCI.
Clinicians can use the identified and classified QoL tools to assess the impact of NBD on QoL in patients with SCI, guiding treatment decisions.
The objective QoL measures, especially the HUI-III, can inform decision-makers on how to allocate funds and resources for various interventions related to bowel care post-SCI.
Advancing treatments for bowel management after SCI have the potential to improve participation and QoL, and the use of condition-specific validated outcome tools is essential for measuring individual progress and treatment effects.