Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercise Training Alters the Relationship Between Spinal Cord Injury Level and Aerobic Capacity

Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercise Training Alters the Relationship Between Spinal Cord Injury Level and Aerobic Capacity

Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014 · DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.412 · Published: November 1, 2014

Spinal Cord InjuryRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This study investigated whether a specific type of exercise, hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Row Training (FES-RT), could improve the aerobic capacity of individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). The researchers wanted to see if this training would lessen the impact of the SCI level on their ability to perform aerobic activities. The study involved participants with complete SCI from T3 to T11 who underwent six months of FES-RT. The results showed that FES-RT significantly increased both peak aerobic capacity and peak exercise ventilation. Before the training, a strong link existed between the level of SCI and aerobic capacity, but this link weakened after FES-RT. This suggests that FES-RT can help people with SCI improve their aerobic capacity regardless of the severity of their spinal cord lesion.

Study Duration
6 Months
Participants
14 volunteers with complete SCI T3_T11
Evidence Level
Longitudinal before-after trial

Key Findings

  • 1
    FES-RT significantly increased VO2peak and VEpeak (both p<0.05).
  • 2
    Prior to FES-RT, there was a close relationship between level of spinal cord injury and VO2peak (adj r2=0.40, p=0.009) that was markedly reduced after FES-RT (adj r2=0.15, p=0.10).
  • 3
    The increased aerobic capacity reflects more than increased ventilation; FES_RT effectively circumvents the effect of the spinal cord injury on peak aerobic capacity by engaging more muscle mass for training, independent of level of injury.

Research Summary

The study aimed to determine if hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Row Training (FES-RT) could improve aerobic capacity in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and alter the relationship between injury level and aerobic capacity. Fourteen volunteers with complete SCI (T3-T11) participated in a six-month FES-RT program. The study measured peak aerobic capacity and peak exercise ventilation before and after the training period. The results showed that FES-RT significantly increased both peak aerobic capacity and peak exercise ventilation. Importantly, the strong relationship between the level of spinal cord injury and aerobic capacity observed before training was significantly reduced after FES-RT.

Practical Implications

Improved Exercise Intervention

FES-RT can be used as an effective exercise intervention to improve health in those with SCI.

Engaging More Muscle Mass

FES-RT effectively circumvents the effect of spinal cord injury by engaging more muscle mass, independent of the level of injury.

Potential for Home-Based Programs

Further refinement of the apparatus could lead to an in-home device, potentially increasing adherence and impact for individuals with SCI.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The study did not include individuals with injuries above the T3 level or any with incomplete injuries, limiting the generalizability of the results.
  • 2
    The FES device used was limited to four channels and only stimulated the quadriceps and hamstrings with a standardized stimulation pattern, which could be optimized for a more vigorous exercise stimulus.
  • 3
    The equipment is not available for home use and transportation can be a significant barrier in those with an SCI.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury