Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Guideline for the identification and management of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury: a case of unsubstantiated recommendations

Guideline for the identification and management of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury: a case of unsubstantiated recommendations

Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 2019 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0240-6 · Published: September 18, 2019

Spinal Cord InjuryCardiovascular ScienceHealthcare

Simple Explanation

The authors express concern that several central recommendations in the 2018 Guideline for the Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) have been offered prematurely. They argue that in some instances, the guideline inappropriately applies data from studies of people without SCI to support SCI-specific suggestions. The authors also question the recommendation to employ tests whose usefulness and clinical relevance have yet to be demonstrated among people living with injuries.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Studies of people with and without SCI
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    There is no correlation between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in the setting of SCI.
  • 2
    There is an apparent lack of correlation between HbA1c and OGTT results in people with SCI.
  • 3
    Despite having “benign” appearing lipid profiles, people with SCI seem to be at risk for accelerated atherosclerosis and coronary artery calcification.

Research Summary

The 2018 Guideline for the Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) represented the first concerted effort to address a cluster of derangements and diseases that are claiming the lives of individuals living with injuries. The authors are concerned that several of the guideline’s central recommendations—particularly around screening for and detection of glycemic dysregulation and dyslipidemia—have been offered prematurely. The guideline authors took on a worthy and ambitious project... The fact that the Guideline failed to answer most of these questions speaks to an alarming paucity of evidence rather than lack of effort or vision by the authors.

Practical Implications

Further Research Needed

The lack of data underpinning several of the guideline's central recommendations underscores the inadequacy of research in this area and provides a roadmap for future investigative efforts.

Re-evaluate Screening Tests

Prior to adopting the current guideline, it is important to answer questions regarding the clinical significance of postprandial glucose spikes and which screening tests best correlate with vascular complications.

Clarify Lipid Management

Given the uncertainty over which screening tests and pharmacological interventions may help reduce CV morbidity and mortality among people with SCI, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of statin therapy and identify tests that can predict atherosclerotic disease.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample sizes in studies
  • 2
    Homogeneity of subjects in studies
  • 3
    Lack of replication of study results

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury