Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care

Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2012 · DOI: 10.1310/sci1804-315 · Published: January 1, 2012

Spinal Cord InjuryPulmonologyNeurology

Simple Explanation

Mechanical ventilation, while life-sustaining, comes with limitations such as reduced function and increased infection risk. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) offers an alternative by stimulating the phrenic nerve or diaphragm, potentially improving quality of life. Diaphragm pacing (DP) has been shown to reduce airway pressure, increase posterior lobe ventilation, and maintain negative chest pressures. DP has also been shown to improve speech, improve olfactory sensation, and eradicate ventilator noise There are two main FES strategies: phrenic nerve pacing (PNP) and diaphragm motor point pacing (DMPP). PNP involves direct stimulation of the phrenic nerve, while DMPP stimulates the diaphragm muscle at its motor points.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
SCI patients requiring ventilation assistance
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Diaphragm pacing can improve speech and olfactory sensation.
  • 2
    Diaphragm pacing may lead to neuroplasticity and, in rare instances, recovery of volitional control of breathing.
  • 3
    Laparoscopic implantation of intramuscular diaphragm electrodes provides a less invasive and less costly alternative to conventional PNP.

Research Summary

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) offers an alternative to mechanical ventilation for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), aiming to improve their quality of life. Diaphragm pacing (DP) can be achieved through phrenic nerve pacing (PNP) or diaphragmatic motor point pacing (DMPP), each with its own surgical approach and considerations. Successful transition from mechanical ventilation to diaphragm pacing requires careful patient selection, conditioning of respiratory muscles, and monitoring of physiological parameters.

Practical Implications

Improved Quality of Life

FES can lead to increased independence and better quality of life for individuals with SCI who require ventilation.

Reduced Healthcare Costs

DMPP offers a less invasive and potentially more cost-effective alternative to PNP.

Restoration of Physiological Functions

Diaphragm pacing can restore or improve functions such as speech, olfaction, and cough in SCI patients.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Absent or reduced phrenic nerve function is a contraindication.
  • 2
    Risk of infection with implanted components.
  • 3
    Upper airway obstruction may occur due to lack of synchronous activation of upper airway muscles.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury