Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

BMC Fam Pract, 2021 · DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01547-0 · Published: September 22, 2021

Spinal Cord InjuryHealthcare

Simple Explanation

This study explores whether people with spinal cord injuries (SCI) first contact a general practitioner (GP) or a SCI-specialist for their healthcare needs. The study found that the choice of first contact depends on factors like age, language, distance to SCI centers, and the severity of their condition. The findings suggest that both GPs and SCI-specialists play important roles in the long-term care of individuals with SCI.

Study Duration
March 2017 and March 2018
Participants
1294 persons with SCI aged over 16 years
Evidence Level
Cross-sectional study

Key Findings

  • 1
    Persons with SCI who initially contact an SCI-specialist have more secondary conditions and use health-care services more often.
  • 2
    Older individuals (≥75 years), Italian speakers, those with incomplete lesions, experiencing pain, or having diabetes are more likely to contact a GP first.
  • 3
    Residing closer to SCI centers or having higher SCI-SCS scores makes individuals less likely to initially consult a GP.

Research Summary

The study examined the first point of contact for health problems related to spinal cord injury (SCI), comparing general practitioners (GPs) and SCI-specialists. Results showed that age, language, distance to SCI centers, lesion completeness, and secondary conditions influence the choice of first contact. The study concludes that both GPs and SCI-specialists play complementary roles in the long-term care of persons with SCI.

Practical Implications

Informed primary-care delivery

The findings can inform new approaches to primary-care delivery that foster well-defined roles of providers and structured referral pathways.

Address geographical disparities

Highlight the impact of rurality and/or geographical location on accessing specialized care.

Clarify roles of providers

Promote well-defined roles of providers and structured referral pathways for both preventive and follow-up SCI care.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Low response rate
  • 2
    Exclusion of participants due to missing values
  • 3
    Cross-sectional design limits causal inference

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury