Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Neurology
  4. Electrospun fiber surface nanotopography influences astrocyte-mediated neurite outgrowth

Electrospun fiber surface nanotopography influences astrocyte-mediated neurite outgrowth

Biomed Mater., 2018 · DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aac4de · Published: June 4, 2018

NeurologyBiomedical

Simple Explanation

This study investigates how the tiny surface features of electrospun fibers affect astrocytes, which are important cells in the brain and spinal cord. The fibers were made with smooth, pitted, or divoted surfaces to see how these differences influenced astrocyte behavior. The research found that astrocytes from different parts of the nervous system (cortex vs. spinal cord) responded differently to the fiber surfaces. Cortical astrocytes changed shape more on pitted and divoted surfaces, while spinal cord astrocytes were less affected. The study also looked at how these surface differences affected the ability of astrocytes to help nerve fibers grow. They found that astrocytes grown on fibers for shorter times generally supported better nerve fiber growth, and that pitted and divoted fibers could hinder this growth for spinal cord astrocytes.

Study Duration
1 or 3 days
Participants
Primary rat cortical or spinal cord astrocytes
Evidence Level
Not specified

Key Findings

  • 1
    Cortical astrocytes were shorter and broader on pitted and divoted fibers compared to smooth fibers, while spinal cord astrocyte morphology was not significantly altered by the surface features.
  • 2
    Differences in astrocyte morphology were not associated with significant changes in GFAP or vinculin expression, suggesting that the surface pits and divots do not induce a reactive phenotype in either cortical or spinal cord astrocytes.
  • 3
    Pitted and divoted fibers restricted spinal cord astrocyte-mediated neurite outgrowth, while smooth fibers increased 3 d spinal cord astrocyte-mediated neurite outgrowth.

Research Summary

This study examined how fiber surface nanotopography influenced astrocyte morphology, GFAP expression, and vinculin expression using electrospun fiber scaffolds with smooth, pitted, or divoted surfaces. The results showed that cortical astrocytes were significantly shorter and broader on the pitted and divoted fibers compared to those on smooth fibers, but spinal cord astrocyte morphology was not significantly altered by the surface features. Fiber surface nanotopography can influence astrocyte elongation and influence the capability of astrocytes to direct neurites, suggesting that fiber surface characteristics should be carefully controlled to optimize astrocyte-mediated axonal regeneration.

Practical Implications

Optimizing Scaffold Design

Careful control of fiber surface nanotopography is crucial for designing effective electrospun fiber scaffolds for CNS regeneration.

Cell-Specific Targeting

Considering the different responses of cortical and spinal cord astrocytes to nanotopography can allow for more targeted cell-specific therapies.

Enhancing Neurite Outgrowth

Selecting appropriate fiber surface characteristics can enhance astrocyte-mediated neurite outgrowth, potentially improving axonal regeneration after injury.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The study only examined astrocyte response at 1 and 3 day time points.
  • 2
    The sample size may have been too low to detect significant differences in GFAP and vinculin expression.
  • 3
    Serum proteins in the media likely coated the surface of the fibers, which may have masked the effects of the surface topography.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Neurology