Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Electrophrenic pacing and decannulation for high-level spinal cord injury: A case series

Electrophrenic pacing and decannulation for high-level spinal cord injury: A case series

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2012 · DOI: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000056 · Published: May 1, 2012

Spinal Cord InjuryPulmonologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This paper discusses managing ventilator-dependent patients with high spinal cord injuries who have little to no ability to breathe on their own. The authors outline patient categories, decannulation guidelines, and success in removing tracheostomy tubes from four patients who had no ventilator-free breathing ability and used electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing. The study highlights that the absence of ventilator-free breathing ability in high-level spinal cord injury patients should not automatically lead to tracheostomy or electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing. Patients with some bulbar muscle function can be decannulated to NVS. The case studies show successful decannulation by adhering to specific criteria, including alertness, cooperative nature, sufficient oxyhemoglobin saturation, and effective manually assisted cough. These patients were then managed with non-invasive ventilation.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
Four ventilator-dependent patients with high-level spinal cord injury
Evidence Level
Level 4: Case Series

Key Findings

  • 1
    Patients with high-level spinal cord injuries and no ventilator-free breathing ability can be successfully decannulated using specific criteria and managed with noninvasive ventilation.
  • 2
    Electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing can facilitate decannulation in patients with no ventilator-free breathing ability or ability to grab a mouthpiece for NVS.
  • 3
    Following decannulation, patients can improve their vital capacity and respiratory function through the use of accessory muscles, glossopharyngeal breathing, and air stacking.

Research Summary

This case series presents the successful decannulation of four ventilator-dependent patients with high-level spinal cord injuries who initially had no ventilator-free breathing ability. The study emphasizes the importance of specific decannulation criteria and the potential for noninvasive ventilation as an alternative to tracheostomy or electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing. The cases demonstrate that patients can be decannulated and transitioned to noninvasive ventilation by ensuring that they are alert, cooperative, have adequate oxyhemoglobin saturation, and can generate sufficient cough peak flows with assistance. Electrophrenic pacing can be beneficial in certain cases to facilitate this transition. The authors advocate for considering decannulation and noninvasive ventilation for patients with high-level spinal cord injuries, even in the absence of ventilator-free breathing ability, and highlight the potential for improved respiratory function and quality of life post-decannulation.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

Clinicians should consider decannulation and noninvasive ventilation as viable options for ventilator-dependent patients with high-level spinal cord injuries, even in the absence of ventilator-free breathing ability.

Patient Selection

Careful patient selection based on specific criteria, including alertness, cooperation, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and cough effectiveness, is crucial for successful decannulation.

Respiratory Management

Post-decannulation respiratory management should focus on optimizing vital capacity, cough effectiveness, and noninvasive ventilation techniques.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Small sample size (case series)
  • 2
    Lack of a control group
  • 3
    Retrospective nature of the study

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury