Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve restores inspiratory diaphragm function in mice after spinal cord injury

Electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve restores inspiratory diaphragm function in mice after spinal cord injury

Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 2025 · DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1480291 · Published: January 22, 2025

Spinal Cord InjuryPhysiologyNeurology

Simple Explanation

Spinal cord injuries in the neck area can disrupt breathing by interrupting signals between the brain and muscles needed for respiration. This study explores whether stimulating nerves in the leg can help restore diaphragm function after such an injury. The researchers stimulated the sciatic nerve in mice with cervical spinal cord injuries and measured diaphragm activity. They found that electrical stimulation could restore inspiratory activity to the diaphragm, even long after the injury. This suggests that therapies targeting limb nerves might help improve breathing in patients with cervical spinal cord injuries. The study also provides a model for further research into how limb nerve stimulation affects respiratory muscle activity.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
C57BL/6J mice
Evidence Level
Original Research

Key Findings

  • 1
    Electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve can increase diaphragm activity in uninjured mice, confirming previous findings in other species.
  • 2
    Sciatic nerve stimulation can restore inspiratory activity to the paralyzed diaphragm after a cervical hemisection injury, both acutely (1 day) and chronically (2 months) after injury.
  • 3
    At chronic stages (2 months post-injury), even lower stimulation thresholds are required to elicit significant increases in inspiratory diaphragm activity compared to 1 day after injury, suggesting plasticity within spinal and/or brain circuits.

Research Summary

This study investigates the effects of electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve on diaphragm activity in healthy and spinal cord injured mice. The study found that electrical stimulation can increase diaphragm activity in uninjured mice. Sciatic nerve stimulation at sufficient thresholds could restore inspiratory activity to the paralyzed diaphragm after a C2 hemisection injury at both acute (1 day) and chronic (2 month) time points after injury. The findings suggest that limb afferent stimulation could potentially improve respiratory function in people with cervical spinal cord injury. This study also provides an experimental model to investigate neural pathways that are activated by limb afferent stimulation.

Practical Implications

Therapeutic Potential

Limb afferent stimulation could be a potential therapy to improve breathing in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.

Rehabilitation Strategies

The findings support the exploration of locomotor training and other rehabilitation strategies that activate limb afferents to improve respiratory function in SCI patients.

Future Research

The experimental model described can be used to further investigate neural pathways and mechanisms by which limb afferents can increase ventilation in injured and uninjured animals.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    The current thresholds required to achieve a significant increase in diaphragm activity are 5–10 times that required to elicit limb movement.
  • 2
    These studies were performed under anesthesia. Responses of respiratory, motor and sensory pathways could differ in non-anesthetized mice.
  • 3
    Our study used freely breathing animals in which half of the ascending and descending axons between the brain and spinal cord were intact.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury