Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Spinal Cord Injury
  4. Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2025 · DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2304921 · Published: January 9, 2024

Spinal Cord InjuryAssistive TechnologyRehabilitation

Simple Explanation

This review examines if combining robotic therapy with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) can improve motor function after incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Motor impairments following SCI can significantly reduce a person's quality of life. The study analyzed five randomized controlled trials, revealing that the combination of robotic therapy and NIBS may be safe for individuals with incomplete SCI, but the existing evidence on its effects is limited. More research is needed to fully understand these effects. NIBS techniques like tDCS and rTMS can modulate brain activity and potentially enhance the benefits of robotic training, which offers repetitive, targeted movements. The review aimed to assess the current evidence for using robotics and NIBS together for motor rehabilitation in SCI patients.

Study Duration
Not specified
Participants
122 individuals with incomplete SCI
Evidence Level
Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Key Findings

  • 1
    The review of five randomized trials (n = 122) showed varied results due to differences in treatment protocols and outcome measures. However, the included studies demonstrated high methodological quality.
  • 2
    Some studies showed improvements in upper extremity motor scores and lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) with combined rTMS and Lokomat therapy compared to sham interventions.
  • 3
    Other studies found significant improvements in walking ability (WISCI II) and balance (BBS) after the interventions. However, not all studies showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups.

Research Summary

This systematic review assessed the effects of combining robotic therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). It analyzed five randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of this combined approach. The review found that while combined robotic training and NIBS appear safe, the evidence supporting their effects on motor outcomes in SCI patients is limited and heterogeneous due to variations in treatment protocols and outcome measures across the included studies. The findings suggest that further experimental studies are necessary to fully understand the potential benefits of combined robotic training and NIBS for motor impairments in SCI populations. These studies should address the limitations identified in the current research.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

While combined robotic therapy and NIBS show promise, clinicians should interpret the current evidence cautiously due to its limitations. Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines for clinical implementation.

Future Research

Future studies should focus on standardized treatment protocols, consistent outcome measures, and larger sample sizes to provide more robust evidence on the efficacy of combined robotic therapy and NIBS for motor rehabilitation in SCI.

Personalized Treatment

Given the heterogeneity in patient characteristics and responses, personalized treatment approaches that consider individual factors may be crucial for optimizing outcomes when using combined robotic therapy and NIBS.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Heterogeneity in treatment protocols and outcome measures
  • 2
    Limited number of included studies
  • 3
    Restriction to experimental studies published in English

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Spinal Cord Injury