Spinal Cord Research Help
AboutCategoriesLatest ResearchContact
Subscribe
Spinal Cord Research Help

Making Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Accessible to Everyone. Simplified summaries of the latest research, designed for patients, caregivers and anybody who's interested.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
  • Latest Research
  • Disclaimer

Contact

  • Contact Us
© 2025 Spinal Cord Research Help

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Assistive Technology
  4. Effectiveness of Robotic Devices for Medical Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review

Effectiveness of Robotic Devices for Medical Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review

J. Clin. Med., 2024 · DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216616 · Published: November 4, 2024

Assistive TechnologyNeurorehabilitationResearch Methodology & Design

Simple Explanation

This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the comprehensive effectiveness of robot-assisted training (RT) or robotic devices for medical rehabilitation, focusing on five areas: number of systematic reviews (SRs), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and participants studied for each disease; quality of SRs for each disease; types of robotic devices used for each disease; outcome measures used in SRs for each disease; and effectiveness of RT for each outcome measure. The study found that robotic devices are useful for improving impairments and disabilities in several diseases, particularly stroke. Upper-limb devices were effective for motor control and activities of daily living, and lower-limb devices for walking independence in stroke patients. The review highlights the need for further high-quality systematic reviews, including randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes and meta-analyses, especially focusing on non-stroke-related diseases. Further research should also identify the most effective type of robotic device for improving specific impairments or disabilities.

Study Duration
2009 to 2023
Participants
14,522 participants
Evidence Level
Umbrella Review

Key Findings

  • 1
    Stroke was the most frequently reported disease in the included systematic reviews (40 SRs), followed by spinal cord injury (8 SRs), multiple sclerosis (4 SRs), cerebral palsy (4 SRs), Parkinson’s disease (3 SRs), and neurological disease (3 SRs).
  • 2
    After removing duplicates, 341 RCTs were included in SRs involving 14,522 participants. With respect to stroke, 126 RCTs (5999 participants) focused on upper-limb devices, whereas 121 RCTs (5030 participants) focused on lower-limb devices.
  • 3
    Robotic devices are useful for improving impairments and disabilities in several diseases. Further high-quality SRs including RCTs with large sample sizes and meta-analyses of these RCTs, particularly on non-stroke-related diseases, are required.

Research Summary

This umbrella review comprehensively examined and analyzed systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating rehabilitative interventions with robotic devices. Overall, 62 SRs of 341 RCTs involving 14,522 participants were identified. Stroke was most frequently reported (40 SRs), followed by spinal cord injury (eight SRs), multiple sclerosis (four SRs), cerebral palsy (four SRs), Parkinson’s disease (three SRs), and neurological disease (any disease causing limited upper- and lower-limb functioning; three SRs). Robotic devices are useful for improving impairments and disabilities in several diseases. Further high-quality SRs including RCTs with large sample sizes and meta-analyses of these RCTs, particularly on non-stroke-related diseases, are required.

Practical Implications

Clinical Practice

Robotic devices show promise in improving impairments and disabilities in various diseases, especially stroke, suggesting their integration into rehabilitation programs.

Further Research

There is a need for high-quality systematic reviews and RCTs, particularly on non-stroke-related diseases, to strengthen the evidence base for robotic rehabilitation.

Device Development

Future research should focus on identifying which type of robotic device is most effective for improving specific impairments or disabilities in different conditions.

Study Limitations

  • 1
    Only studies in English were included, potentially overestimating the effectiveness of robotic devices.
  • 2
    This review did not include more recent reviews, as robotic rehabilitation is a fast-paced advancing field with respect to scientific publications and development speed, and newer reviews are therefore constantly required.
  • 3
    Most presented evidence was from trials with a limited number of robots.

Your Feedback

Was this summary helpful?

Back to Assistive Technology